Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Soldato
Joined
18 Feb 2004
Posts
3,095
Location
Lincolnshire
Just a heads up there is a new bios update, been a while since one was released.

Version 3505

X99-PRO/USB 3.1 BIOS 3505
1.Improve System Performance.
2.Improved DRAM compatibility
3.Fixed TPM issue
4.Add in turn-off function of LED under S3/S4/S5 status.
5.Fixed Samsung device (SM961, printer) issues.

File Size 7.92 MBytes 2017/03/10

Download
 
Hi, I tried to install this last week (currently on 3301) but it keeps bringing up "not a proper BIOS file" no matter what I do.
I've updated it no probs several times before. And I wouldnt normally bother every time due to the risk but this one sounds worthwhile especialy the improved performance
I tried it without renaming since i never had to in the past, then renaming it to X99PU31.CAP, X99P.CAP, then tried on another usb 2.0 drive with no success
of course i loaded defaults & removed all unnecesary devices
any ideas?
thanks!
 
I havent installed it yet not had chance too, i have read on another site today that there is some issues with it remembering certain settings when they have been applied for some people.

Not seen any reports of it not flashing though.

found this by some people -

ASUS X99 PRO - In the new 3505 BIOS, all CPU Power Phase controls are broken. If reverts to "Standard" regardless of whether you set Optimized, Extreme, or any of the Manual Settings (regular to very fast). I then installed AI Suite so I could see the current power state and also try to influence it from the program. Same results: All standard, all the time. Flashed back to 3402 and all is normal again with full control over all BIOS settings. This is the third time for the 3402 -> 3505 flash, so I am comfortable ruling out an update error. This was done on the Optimized Defaults, save the Power Phase and setting my water pump to run at 100%. I then repeated it all with my standard overclock, where I am more familiar with all of the VRM temperatures for the various phase settings.

It's kind of hard to believe this slipped through the testing protocols on all of the internal versions 3501-3504 and now the public release. If this is deliberate, we need a slightly more elaborate explanation than the normally very thorough update notes.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1510328/...upport-thread-north-american-users-only/15150

more info there, some say it causes issues some say thiers is ok.
 
Last edited:
ok thanks :)
I thought about updating to 3402 then 3505 in 2 steps, but my current version is fine
I will leave it until the next one then and hope it works - maybe it was a good thing it didnt flash if I avoided a problematic one
 
Back
Top Bottom