At it like bunnies.

I think our outward activity is a manifest of our inner self. She values sex (physical) over a relationship (emotion).
Whilst the case for some, what I mean is, both men and women are allowed to enjoy sex, they should not be judged for it, just like people who don't have much of a sex drive should not be judged for that.

The whole bodycount thing is a load of misogynistic nonsense.
 
Whilst the case for some, what I mean is, both men and women are allowed to enjoy sex, they should not be judged for it, just like people who don't have much of a sex drive should not be judged for that.

The whole bodycount thing is a load of misogynistic nonsense.
I'm looking at it from a society view.

Sex and sex drive isn't a problem. Having many partners is, especially when they are spreading around STD's. It's disgusting, and self degrading.

I can see why body count might be seen as misogynistic initially. But not if you understand why it's being mentioned.

The reason why the light focuses on women is because their purity is MORE valuable than a man's.
 
You think this being driven by youngsters? It's folk that's 40+ that are causing it apparently :p
Funny that this demographic is the one that typically occupies nudist beaches and dogging sites, so I read about anyway :p
 
I seem to recall I got a full STD testing kit from my OCUK Secret Santa.

Took some explaining a couple of times, but I still have it just in case. :)
 
I'm looking at it from a society view.

Sex and sex drive isn't a problem. Having many partners is, especially when they are spreading around STD's. It's disgusting, and self degrading.

I can see why body count might be seen as misogynistic initially. But not if you understand why it's being mentioned.

The reason why the light focuses on women is because their purity is MORE valuable than a man's.

Spreading STDs is grim regardless of gender, and you can do that just sleeping with 3 people, as well as sleep with 20 people safely without STDs,

Your last line exactly proves my points about it all being misogynistic. Purity? Seriously? Are you medieval?
 
Spreading STDs is grim regardless of gender, and you can do that just sleeping with 3 people, as well as sleep with 20 people safely without STDs,

Your last line exactly proves my points about it all being misogynistic. Purity? Seriously? Are you medieval?

That last line. I thought I misinterpreted it.
 
And they don't give a monkey's what you think of them :)

But this line also highlights the issue. You don't respect women, you 'respect' some made-up and projected 'dignity' to judge them on.
The word "purity" gave me mega cringe.

I wonder what my gf would think reading it.
 
And they don't give a monkey's what you think of them :)

But this line also highlights the issue. You don't respect women, you 'respect' some made-up and projected 'dignity' to judge them on.
The reality is most of the world think like me. If you are honest you do too.

It's guys like you who follow the Andrew Tate ideology that are encouraging the objectification and degradation of women.
 
The reality is most of the world think like me. If you are honest you do too.

It's guys like you who follow the Andrew Tate ideology that are encouraging the objectification and degradation of women.
Woman aren't all the same. Just like men there are totally different attitudes.

Brandishing a whole gender with "purity" or some nonsense belongs in the past.

Some men sleep around some don't, and everything in between.

I don't even fully understand why you are saying. That women are to be treated differently to men because they are "pure"? What even is that? It's degrading and patronising and maybe pedestaling?
 
A woman's dignity is defined by her, not by you.
As it should be. But it’s not me pressuring her in to sex.

For the record I blame the men peer pressuring women to be this promiscuous because of all the porn they are consuming. Then we have people like Tate making it socially acceptable for men to treat women like that.

I had thought you were against the teachings of Tate.

I don't even fully understand why you are saying. That women are to be treated differently to men because they are "pure"? What even is that? It's degrading and patronising and maybe pedestaling?
How can you type about about me being degrading when you think it's normal for a woman to have a train run on her many times? You seem to have talked yourself in to unacceptable behaviour and have twisted it as though you are respecting them.

You're right that there have always been guys who have slept around. They are usually guys with no morals and would sleep with anything. Nothing respectable about sleeping around. Just people with no self control and probable underlying reasons why they are like that.

I'm surprised that more people aren't shocked that a girl as slept with a literal platoon of men within a month and think its normal.
 
Last edited:
I had thought you were against the teachings of Tate.
I've never discussed the subject, you must be confusing me with someone else.

For the record I blame the men peer pressuring women to be this promiscuous because of all the porn they are consuming

For the record, I think a lot of women just really enjoy being banged on a regular basis. And good for them.
 
Last edited:
The reality is most of the world think like me. If you are honest you do too.

It's guys like you who follow the Andrew Tate ideology that are encouraging the objectification and degradation of women.
Lol, I follow the Tate ideology? Wtf, I think he is a complete troglodyte. Your views align more with his than my do.

Assigning women value based on how many people they have slept with is 100% a Tate concept.

The fact that you think women who enjoy sex only do so because men coerce them into it, is again telling how you really view women.
 
Lol, I follow the Tate ideology? Wtf, I think he is a complete troglodyte. Your views align more with his than my do.

Assigning women value based on how many people they have slept with is 100% a Tate concept.

The fact that you think women who enjoy sex only do so because men coerce them into it, is again telling how you really view women.
The fact you think it's normal for a woman to have 100 sex partners is telling how you view them.

I'm looking out for women by mentioning purity, which you seemed to take offense at.

What do you think of men who have 100+ sex partners?
 
Back
Top Bottom