-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Athlon 64 1500+
- Thread starter ACESHIGH
- Start date
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2005
- Posts
- 8,721
- Location
- Cleveland, Ohio, USA
The lowest number Athlon 64 I've ever encountered is 2800+. Are you sure you don't mean Athlon XP 1500 which did exist and was based on the Palomino core?
If it is a XP 1500 (the slowest of all the XP models BTW) it is definitely not skt939. It'll be socket A.
If it is a XP 1500 (the slowest of all the XP models BTW) it is definitely not skt939. It'll be socket A.
Thats what i kind of thought at first, but it is an A64 CPU.
A64 s939 - Runs at 1 gig with 512 L2 cache & a 5x multi.
found some details here ..
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12390_na/12390_na.HTML
Becuase it uses SODIMM ram & the memory controller is on the CPU, i guess that means it wont run on a normal s939 mobo. Ahh well may have to let the opportunity pass.
A64 s939 - Runs at 1 gig with 512 L2 cache & a 5x multi.
found some details here ..
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12390_na/12390_na.HTML
Becuase it uses SODIMM ram & the memory controller is on the CPU, i guess that means it wont run on a normal s939 mobo. Ahh well may have to let the opportunity pass.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2005
- Posts
- 8,721
- Location
- Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Madness, I say. It appears to be an underclocked Clawhammer or Newcastle and as such probably has an 800 MHz HT bus. It's generally accepted that oddball stuff like blade servers deffo won't overclock much.
Last edited:
Suspended
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 218
I wouldn't touch it - looks like a scam as it ain't an official processor, and may not clock back upto decent levels.