ATI r700

psychas · 26 Jul 2007 at 13:13

any new details on r700 just hear that they will be multicore and maybe 45nm?

div0 · 26 Jul 2007 at 13:54

I heard it'll be late!

(only joking - I've heard nothing)

RavenUK · 26 Jul 2007 at 13:56

Apparently it will be four times as powerful as the 9800GTX and use less power. :eek:

Azza · 26 Jul 2007 at 13:58

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_R700

MystaEB · 26 Jul 2007 at 13:59

Ugh, I hate speculation so much. It just gets idiots riled up for nothing.

The only thing anyone should ever believe at this stage is that it will probably be called the X3900.

Scougar · 26 Jul 2007 at 14:07

Radeon R800

lol, I love it

Matthew

Sumanji · 26 Jul 2007 at 19:17

MystaEB said:
The only thing anyone should ever believe at this stage is that it will probably be called the X3900.

HD3800 most probably

jaykay · 26 Jul 2007 at 19:18

I think it will have 1000 stream proccesors running at 1ghz clock speed.

willhub · 26 Jul 2007 at 19:40

Maybe they will give it 320 stream processors capable of doing 5 operations or w/e you call it like the 64*5 on the HD2900XT, also maybe it may run lower latency GDDR4 memory clocked at 2.4Ghz and maybe bump the ROP's up to 24 or 32.

jaykay · 26 Jul 2007 at 19:55

Well the r7xx will be 55nm.
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTE4NTQ2OTkxMjJ2MmhNdjlpZHRfMV8zX2wuZ2lm
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTE4NTQ2OTkxMjJ2MmhNdjlpZHRfMV8yX2wuZ2lm
See the right column.

willhub · 26 Jul 2007 at 20:02

I dont think the R700 will be 4 times more powerfull than a 9800GTX, I just hope they come out at the same time, I hope the R700 price will be competitive too.

schumi84 · 26 Jul 2007 at 20:56

I reckon this could all turn out like the 2900 cards.

I hope for ATi and our sake that it doesn't, as would like to see some good old fashioned competition.

chaparral · 26 Jul 2007 at 22:16

straxusii · 27 Jul 2007 at 03:11

After the 2900 debacle no one will believe any hype surrounding r700 until it hits reviewers hands.

Gerard · 27 Jul 2007 at 03:23

I really think there was only really 2 things wrong with r600, it was amazingly late (yet again) and the fps hit when using fsaa. r700 should get them back on track, that is assuming they can for once get the new core out without many delays.

I miss the days of reading reviews of the new nvidia and the new ati cards with the space of a few days between them, now its literally 6months between those kinds of reviews. :mad:

agnes · 27 Jul 2007 at 03:29

hmmmm, probably going to fail terribly again lol, and again, the lower range of the g90's being used as benchmarkc comparison against them.... and the high d g90's being untouchable lol

ags

Gerard · 27 Jul 2007 at 04:06

riiiiiight Its amazing that people can have that attitude while knowing that we NEED competition.

Rezident · 27 Jul 2007 at 09:28

div0 said:
I heard it'll be late!

heh heh

Dutch Guy · 27 Jul 2007 at 10:10

Gerard said:
I really think there was only really 2 things wrong with r600, it was amazingly late (yet again) and the fps hit when using fsaa. r700 should get them back on track, that is assuming they can for once get the new core out without many delays.

3 things, I would add the power use as well to the things wrong with it.