Was thumbing through the July PC zone this morning. Found something interesting written in the editorial from the HARDWARE editor.
Apparently they have run into big problems with the memory - 1GB is really giving them headaches.
Sven Olsen of the "DailyTech" website (but this could be taken with a pinch of salt, no confirmation or denial from ATI) - which was one of the first sites to benchmark the X2900XTX (in a synthetic benchmark, not game benchmarks) has even suggested that "because of the huge memory costs, the card may well never become a reality"
I hope for ATI's sake that this is all just some bloke who has no clue about what he is talking, for if this is true then it is not looking good for them... Especially as G90 is on the way now. Even if the 2900 XTX does come out this year, chances are it will only be a bit faster than the G80 - where G90 will be a second gen DX10 card and could well feature vastly improved perforance in DX9 and DX 10...
Apparently they have run into big problems with the memory - 1GB is really giving them headaches.
Sven Olsen of the "DailyTech" website (but this could be taken with a pinch of salt, no confirmation or denial from ATI) - which was one of the first sites to benchmark the X2900XTX (in a synthetic benchmark, not game benchmarks) has even suggested that "because of the huge memory costs, the card may well never become a reality"
I hope for ATI's sake that this is all just some bloke who has no clue about what he is talking, for if this is true then it is not looking good for them... Especially as G90 is on the way now. Even if the 2900 XTX does come out this year, chances are it will only be a bit faster than the G80 - where G90 will be a second gen DX10 card and could well feature vastly improved perforance in DX9 and DX 10...


