Audi TT good or bad ?

well I think they are crap also, the 3.2 quattro version using the Haldex front wheel drive biased 4wd system is a shame to the original **1 name, the Haldex 4wd system was invented for the R32 golf, which is a fantastic machine in its own right, after driving the 3.2TT Im shocked how some people think they are good.

the original **1 audi was a milestone in automotive history, the TT is also going to be remembered, but for no good reasons i think. the **1 used a true mechanical 4 wheel drive system where as Haldex is front wheel biased so is bias towards the wrong end of the car thus giving crap ahndling.

now if you see a female driving one, I thing thats perfectly fine, what do they know about cars anyways, exactly, but where I live there are several blokes driving them round thinking they are driving the best car on the road and are clearly mistaken.

there nothing wrong with driving a crap car just know your place, and if you drive a good car, dont be a **** about it :)

anyways thats the way I see it, I was just trying to get a feel for what the forum users here are like after the accusations today of my being some imposter I got the impression you where a bunch of kids who knew **** all, thanks for clearing that up.
 
Last edited:
DRZ said:
claimed to have a car
Click to expand...

ok I did read the other posts and im only telling you as a long term user of several forums what I thought, am I bad for giving you my advice on what I saw?

anyways lets not get the handbags out, I guess ive not read the posts of the kids pretending on here like they do on PH forums, it is very rare on there though ill be honest, mabe it is more frequent on here . . . . . . . . and if so that would make the point above hold more weight.

young posting style, im like 29 dude . . . . .
 
i think also this fully starring out your swearwords thing sort of confirms a much younger audience than I thought was here.

not to say thats a bad thing, just excusing my mistake of swearing ;)
 
i agree with what peterNem says about loving your car "who cares" but in my eyes, driven a few different types of TT they are all really bad, like shocking enough for me to make a post about on a forum I joined yesterday.

i dont care what a car looks like (I drive a bath tub for gods sake) its how it works as a car, and thats what im talking about, yes the 4 motion was the first golf the haldex system was made for but VW already had the planes to use it in the R32 in place, the R32 is the real deal, and Haldex works very well in it, the 3.2TT seems to loose it all, go drive one you will see.

its like the mustang, figures add up looks OK i suppose, crap car when you drive it, only somone who has no clue would buy either
 
R32's are amazing, I had a "issue" with one once through heavy traffic on country lanes. the guy had no fear but the car really did suprise me, the 4wd set up is made for the R32 so it works well as there is a lot of weight over the reaer wheels, on the TT its the complete opposite, like they made it for the looks . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 
an R32 is sure to keep the smile on your face, very capable car but go and drive a 3.2TT before or after and you will see what im talking about, there is no focus, no real feedback from the machine, id have a R32 if I swapped my current car.
 
[TW]Fox said:
a) Haldex was not developed for the R32 Golf
b) How did you drive the Audi TT 3.2 V6 if you are, as you said in another thread, 14? ;)
Click to expand...

of course im not 14, duh. . . . . .I was taking the michael as people where suggesting I was some low life who was just lying?? like yeah im 14 and have several high powered road weapons What was haldex developed for then mr fox ?

also is it not possible for somone to own a real car on here without a huge suspicion coup ?

is there really no one else here that drives a special car? I dont believe that for a second.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom