Game devs should focus more on gameplay and less on shiny eye candy imo.
The problem is that games like BG2 are such a niche market that I doubt any large publishers are really interested.
Which is why we tend to end up with action-RPG's (with the emphasis on action and watered down character development and progression) so it appeals to a wider audience.
I really want to re-install BG2, but I just know it'll sap all my free timeWhat classes have you all started? Loved my Wood Elf Archer.
I agree and I disagree.
Game developers need their game to look nice and shiny to attract people.
But they need to focus on game play, This thread has made me want to whack on my old Baldurs gate games.
I think that very few game developers use the idea, If it 'ent broke don't fix it.
Too many games are coming out, where they lose what made the game great in the eyes of the fans because they want to try something new / make it look nicer.
Why not simply make a different game and not ruin a very good franchise.
Didn't Baldur's Gate and Baldur's Gate II sell in huge amounts?
Didn't Baldur's Gate and Baldur's Gate II sell in huge amounts?
Though it is unlikely that a proper Baldur's Gate game will be made, more likely being another 'BG: Dark Alliance' game which really has very little to do with the actual BG games. I hope they prove me wrong!Wikipedia on Baldur's Gate Series said:On 2 December 2008, Atari stated in a press conference that the Baldur's Gate series (among others) would be revisited after 2009.
Or worse, a BG MMOGreat games, I'm still hoping on this:
Though it is unlikely that a proper Baldur's Gate game will be made, more likely being another 'BG: Dark Alliance' game which really has very little to do with the actual BG games. I hope they prove me wrong!
Bit of research shows that it did actually sell very well. According to this site:
http://combatskillz.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6
Both BG2 and the expansion sold 2m copies each - which is respectable looking at what others sold.