28 Nov 2006 at 14:05 #41 Tute Tute Soldato Joined 24 Jul 2004 Posts 22,593 Location Devon, UK Neither. 1942 /w Desert Combat. Job done.
28 Nov 2006 at 14:17 #42 Loki Loki Soldato Joined 17 Nov 2004 Posts 10,306 Location The Republic I was going to say that Tute as BF2 left me really cold. POE2 was a good game. Is 2142 as buggy as BF2 was around release ?
I was going to say that Tute as BF2 left me really cold. POE2 was a good game. Is 2142 as buggy as BF2 was around release ?
28 Nov 2006 at 20:12 #43 tomanders91 tomanders91 Permabanned OP Joined 26 Nov 2006 Posts 3,954 Location guildford, surrey well im gonna go for both, and ive finnally ordererd my crappy parts, so can i run 2142 smoothly on low settings? P4 2.66ghz 1gb DDR ram 7600GS 256mb AGP
well im gonna go for both, and ive finnally ordererd my crappy parts, so can i run 2142 smoothly on low settings? P4 2.66ghz 1gb DDR ram 7600GS 256mb AGP
28 Nov 2006 at 20:48 #44 silversurfer silversurfer Soldato Joined 13 Jul 2004 Posts 20,356 Location Stanley Hotel, Colorado More memory would have been good, even bf2 can take upto 2 gigs
28 Nov 2006 at 22:39 #45 Pranksterr Pranksterr Associate Joined 18 Jul 2006 Posts 198 BF2 by far, is just a lot more fun and suits my play style. Hopefully both games wont beable to touch BF3 when its released hopefully before the summer, ET:QW
BF2 by far, is just a lot more fun and suits my play style. Hopefully both games wont beable to touch BF3 when its released hopefully before the summer, ET:QW
29 Nov 2006 at 00:22 #46 Hyper Hyper Soldato Joined 2 Jul 2005 Posts 3,549 Location Newcastle titaniumx3 said: 2142 for noobs, Bf2 for for the L33t! Click to expand... Agreed ^^^