The last battlefield I really enjoyed playing on line was Bad Company 2. I don't really see the point in remastering BF3 its not that old is it?
2011.
Get rid of the blue hue, nerf the M16 meta and let me rock and roll on containers and metro until my fingers bleed.
On steam now isn't it? Custom servers could be cool, gun game on ziba tower - I sucked at it but damn was it good.
Proper rush on damavan peak, yes please.
Just the visuals would be nice. Add 4k textures, remodelled objects & global illumination.Why? It's not like it came out 20 years ago to have it warrant a remaster with better visuals etc.
Same here, it's close to 20 years old now and visually has aged quite a bit. A revamp of that would be nice.
Most definitely this.If there is any Battlefield game that deserves a remaster, it's Battlefield 2.
I agree. Isnt Revive still going strong?If there is any Battlefield game that deserves a remaster, it's Battlefield 2.
If there is any Battlefield game that deserves a remaster, it's Battlefield 2.
a lot of the maps are dotted through 3 and 4 so what would you remaster? Just update the graphics?If there is any Battlefield game that deserves a remaster, it's Battlefield 2.
1942 on a bigger scale would be BFV?This or do 1942 on a much bigger scale.
1942 on a bigger scale would be BFV?
This kind of thinking of bigger scale annoys me. there are some maps in bf1 and bfv that are way to big that the action is non existent. The flags are so spread out you end up with say 2/3 people from each team around 1 objective.
And then the circle of objectives commences.
Go to A - no enemies - take flag - notice you are losing B.
Go to B - no enemies - take flag - losing A
It's like at some point dice just made all the maps bigger to please fans who wanted "the largest maps" and forgot that the player count was still limited.

I love bf3, been playing it for the last month and it has aged well imo. Some QOL tweaks would improve it but it's fine as is, only thing missing is a large playerbase.
