• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

BattleField Hardline Performance Review AMD vs Nvidia

Kaapstad

Kaapstad

Kaapstad

Man of Honour
Joined
21 May 2012
Posts
31,936
Location
Dalek flagship
This is a few days old but worth posting.:)

BattleField Hardline Performance Review AMD vs Nvidia by Tom Logan.

http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/software/battlefield_hardline_performance_review_amd_vs_nvidia/1

ZDMu3mi.jpg
 
Very good to see playable rates from both camps, but I won't deny it's nice to see AMD on top for once in a while at the moment. Wonder what would have happened if they'd added Mantle into the mix rather than restricting to just DX11?
 
Confused Stu said:
Very good to see playable rates from both camps, but I won't deny it's nice to see AMD on top for once in a while at the moment. Wonder what would have happened if they'd added Mantle DirectX 12/Vulkan into the mix rather than restricting to just DX11?
Click to expand...

:)
 
I can say for the short time i had the swift that game ran surprisingly well on my 780 lightning even when i cranked stuff up. With everything maxed except post proccessing which was set to medium and effects which was set to high and MSAA off and AO off, i was sitting between 90-110 in multiplayer. Didnt try singleplayer though and it does seem singleplayer is more punishing. I would assume the above numbers are from SP?
 
Nice to see AMD doing well in these tests. Hopefully we'll continue to see drivers improving and both manufacturers getting the best from their cards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom