http://www.theguardian.com/media/20...st-countryfile-louise-minchin-sofa-dan-walker
Yup, someone is kicking up a fuss over which side of the sofa a male and female presenter sit. I think this ranks up there with micro-aggressions, the article doesn't provide much in the way of argument re: why this is the 'senior' position. At face value it seems more like this is often the default 'male' position which isn't necessarily equivalent to claiming it is the 'senior' one. But it does seem like we're going to see more complains about things like this, once real issues surrounding sexism, racism and other forms of bigotry have been dealt with then people seem to have to scrape the barrel and find much more trivial issues or even just make up things that aren't really issues and complain about them.
Miriam O’Reilly has blamed “deep-rooted misogyny in newsrooms” for the way male presenters are nearly always seated in the position considered most senior on the left.
Her comments follow the row over the BBC’s decision to put a younger, less experienced man on the left-hand side of Louise Minchin on the BBC Breakfast sofa. The left-hand slot, previously filled by veteran presenter Bill Turnbull, is typically known as “presenter one” by TV producers and is often filled by the most senior member of a presenting duo.
Yup, someone is kicking up a fuss over which side of the sofa a male and female presenter sit. I think this ranks up there with micro-aggressions, the article doesn't provide much in the way of argument re: why this is the 'senior' position. At face value it seems more like this is often the default 'male' position which isn't necessarily equivalent to claiming it is the 'senior' one. But it does seem like we're going to see more complains about things like this, once real issues surrounding sexism, racism and other forms of bigotry have been dealt with then people seem to have to scrape the barrel and find much more trivial issues or even just make up things that aren't really issues and complain about them.