The faithful cant confirm their thoughts so its just a game of luck at the end.
BBC Gameshow - The Traitors
- Thread starter PermaChanged
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 May 2003
- Posts
- 9,215
I thought it was hilarious when Nick and David screwed up so badly. Joe had literally told them what he was going to do it, why he was going to do it and then did it. And they took that demonstration as proof he was a traitor. Arf. I laughed my socks off.
Still I found the whole show unexpectedly quite entertaining, only saw it after Paloma had been picked out for murder but don't think I missed anything meaningful before that.
Still I found the whole show unexpectedly quite entertaining, only saw it after Paloma had been picked out for murder but don't think I missed anything meaningful before that.
Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 2,100
- Location
- Cheltenham
You missed episode 1 with a cameraman doing us a solid by concentrating on Charlotte Church during the first task…
It’s an amazing program for examining psychology, especially as you know who’s on what side. With the celebrity one you know their personality already and can see how they might be acting (Alan being himself was ironically the best cover in the entire game, even when he couldn’t say he was faithful without laughing)
The normal show works differently because you don’t know anyone or their personality, and neither do the other contestants. The series with the 22 year old Army guy was amazing to watch - he had one girl with him all the way through to the final two then threw her under the bus
I doubt there will ever be a traitor as good as Harry!You missed episode 1 with a cameraman doing us a solid by concentrating on Charlotte Church during the first task…
It’s an amazing program for examining psychology, especially as you know who’s on what side. With the celebrity one you know their personality already and can see how they might be acting (Alan being himself was ironically the best cover in the entire game, even when he couldn’t say he was faithful without laughing)
The normal show works differently because you don’t know anyone or their personality, and neither do the other contestants. The series with the 22 year old Army guy was amazing to watch - he had one girl with him all the way through to the final two then threw her under the bus
No. They changed it after the second series where if Mollie had actually thought about it for more than a fraction of a second, she’d have known that Harry was a traitor.
So she had a chance. The new system its just random.
With the new system id just keep voting until theres only 2 left.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,416
Yeah there's no benefit to keeping 3 at the end, even if you are sure everyone is faithful.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,416
Series 4 has started with a twist that some of you had hoped for previously.
Best of both Worlds?
Best of both Worlds?
Nice to have an extra twist now on series 4 + a few "specials"
Will see how it develops but interesting twist that is for sure.
I'm sure it will be explained (if it happens), but wondering what happens if red cloak is voted out at a round table? BBC website didn't look to cover that question around it off.