The faithful cant confirm their thoughts so its just a game of luck at the end.
BBC Gameshow - The Traitors
- Thread starter PermaChanged
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 May 2003
- Posts
- 9,217
I thought it was hilarious when Nick and David screwed up so badly. Joe had literally told them what he was going to do it, why he was going to do it and then did it. And they took that demonstration as proof he was a traitor. Arf. I laughed my socks off.
Still I found the whole show unexpectedly quite entertaining, only saw it after Paloma had been picked out for murder but don't think I missed anything meaningful before that.
Still I found the whole show unexpectedly quite entertaining, only saw it after Paloma had been picked out for murder but don't think I missed anything meaningful before that.
Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 2,108
- Location
- Cheltenham
You missed episode 1 with a cameraman doing us a solid by concentrating on Charlotte Church during the first task…
It’s an amazing program for examining psychology, especially as you know who’s on what side. With the celebrity one you know their personality already and can see how they might be acting (Alan being himself was ironically the best cover in the entire game, even when he couldn’t say he was faithful without laughing)
The normal show works differently because you don’t know anyone or their personality, and neither do the other contestants. The series with the 22 year old Army guy was amazing to watch - he had one girl with him all the way through to the final two then threw her under the bus
I doubt there will ever be a traitor as good as Harry!You missed episode 1 with a cameraman doing us a solid by concentrating on Charlotte Church during the first task…
It’s an amazing program for examining psychology, especially as you know who’s on what side. With the celebrity one you know their personality already and can see how they might be acting (Alan being himself was ironically the best cover in the entire game, even when he couldn’t say he was faithful without laughing)
The normal show works differently because you don’t know anyone or their personality, and neither do the other contestants. The series with the 22 year old Army guy was amazing to watch - he had one girl with him all the way through to the final two then threw her under the bus
No. They changed it after the second series where if Mollie had actually thought about it for more than a fraction of a second, she’d have known that Harry was a traitor.
So she had a chance. The new system its just random.
With the new system id just keep voting until theres only 2 left.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,425
Yeah there's no benefit to keeping 3 at the end, even if you are sure everyone is faithful.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,425
Series 4 has started with a twist that some of you had hoped for previously.
Best of both Worlds?
Best of both Worlds?
Nice to have an extra twist now on series 4 + a few "specials"
Will see how it develops but interesting twist that is for sure.
I'm sure it will be explained (if it happens), but wondering what happens if red cloak is voted out at a round table? BBC website didn't look to cover that question around it off.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,425
They would have to say they were a traitor, and that's probably about it.
I did say to my wife it would be funny if they got the red cloak out straight away by chance.
Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 2,108
- Location
- Cheltenham
And then another one would be appointed, like a normal traitor. It’s basically adding another layer of traitor, and should be an interesting change to the format, seeing as you can’t just add Alan Carr to every series.
Last edited:
It's gonna have to get so twisty to keep it fresh as time goes on, by the end we all gonna be dizzy AF.
I don't like the early episodes of the show, nobody knows anyone, people are accusing and acting on the shallowest of suspicion and it's for me very cringe.
There's 1 caveat to that and it's the ex policewoman, detective investigation, what ever her role was. If she's not a secret traitor, which would have been too notch choice. Then listen to her she's surely got the ability to hunt a traitor within the first few hours of knowing you.
(Ofc no one knows her background at this point tho right )
I don't like the early episodes of the show, nobody knows anyone, people are accusing and acting on the shallowest of suspicion and it's for me very cringe.
There's 1 caveat to that and it's the ex policewoman, detective investigation, what ever her role was. If she's not a secret traitor, which would have been too notch choice. Then listen to her she's surely got the ability to hunt a traitor within the first few hours of knowing you.
(Ofc no one knows her background at this point tho right )
Myself and the good lady indoors have watched the other countries seasons also. The ex police/law enforcement in the Australian S2 were some of the worst players we'd seen, a stiff breeze and their opinions changed and they got it wrong.....every.....single.....time. That isn't to say it won't be different this time around
.
Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 2,108
- Location
- Cheltenham
I refuse to believe that two random people selected from the tens of thousands that must have applied happened to know each other from a decade beforehand - on a show like this, there has to be more to it than that.
although she was the first one banished so that’ll just feed the theories even more
