I have a Core i3 2100 myself. It lacks full hardware virtualisation - however most people here are considering gaming benchmarks only and probably don't realise this. The Core i5 2500K also has partial hardware virtualisation(lacks I/O MMU virtualisation) unlike the standard Core i5 CPUs.
Yea then thats no good. Without that the VM OS just go around in a loop. I'll look in to the AMD, as its something I need I'll have to find a way.
Why does your work force you to get lots of ram, What is the computer used for? It sounds to me like you would be better off with a Phenom II setup.[\quote]
What sort of work do you do? May be better to go AMD as they seem to have more virtualization support on their lower end CPUs if you need it?[\quote]
I develop on a Microsoft ERP so its designed to be run on meaty servers. Microsoft kindly release fully configured Hyper-V virtual machines, which I used to play. However the latest and newest version need a lot of beef to run. I can run these on 64bit Windows 7 machines with a little work. At the offcial training they used 12GB assigned to the Hyper-V and it struggled.
While I could do things in work there are projects I'd like to try outside of the work servers (playing with security etc.) so I want my home PC to be able to run it.
Thanks again for your suggestions!
Last edited: