I'm building a Windows server that will be under constant high CPU load, the levels I'm expecting are constant up to 90% CPU load for at least 24 hours during Monday to Friday.
The processor will be a standard i7 4770 that is air cooled, if it's kinder on the board I'm even considering the S version of the chip. Case will be cooled well with Silverstone Evolution case, and using Seasonic Gold PSU.
My question is are the higher end Gigabyte boards more reliable over the cheaper boards? The higher end boards have more power phases but does this translate to increased reliability when not overclocking?
If you compare say a £180 Z87X-UD4H over a £110 Z87-D3HP is one more robust over the other, or is the extra cost just for features such as SLI that my server would never use. I notice both boards come with 3 year guarantee, I did look for MTTF failure information but unable to find anything.
GIGA-Man does Gigabyte have any testing data when your boards are under constant high load?
Thanks
Jason
The processor will be a standard i7 4770 that is air cooled, if it's kinder on the board I'm even considering the S version of the chip. Case will be cooled well with Silverstone Evolution case, and using Seasonic Gold PSU.
My question is are the higher end Gigabyte boards more reliable over the cheaper boards? The higher end boards have more power phases but does this translate to increased reliability when not overclocking?
If you compare say a £180 Z87X-UD4H over a £110 Z87-D3HP is one more robust over the other, or is the extra cost just for features such as SLI that my server would never use. I notice both boards come with 3 year guarantee, I did look for MTTF failure information but unable to find anything.
GIGA-Man does Gigabyte have any testing data when your boards are under constant high load?
Thanks
Jason