Best possible results for digitising ultrasound baby scans

[grumpybeard]

Bit of a different one this, hoping some folks here can help.

We had a difficult twins pregnancy last year, and have a whole folder with about 50 printed ultrasound scans from the pregnancy. They are a bit special to us, so we'd like to get the prints digitised before the printed versions fade, and so we can add a few of them to some photobooks we're putting together.

Looing for thoughts on what might be the best way to extract digitised versions. I don't have direct access to a decent scanner, which I suppose might offer resolutions of 150/300/600 DPI?

I also dont have any macro lens for my Fuji X-E3 which could possibly be used to take a photograph of each? Using my current lenses I can't get close enough with good focus to fill the viewfinder with the scan.

Do you guys think scanning or photographing, by self or via professional service, might be ways to get the best results?

Thanks very much!

 

[Greebo]

Best way would be a high end scanner but you would need to send it to a proefessional. No idea what high end scanners scan at now but I had one which scanned at 4,800dpi and that was years ago.

 

[Donnie Fisher]

Take photos of them, it'll come out fine. I've done it with old photographs which I've then enlarged to poster size.

You won't need macro, just either zoom in from a distance or set the distance to something where the camera can lock focus and the photos are filling the frame fine.

I took bracketed exposures to make sure I captured the full range of the original.

Setup a simple rig to ensure that the photo and camera are held in the same place.

 

[ttaskmaster]

NVM

 

[Steampunk]

You can buy a new Canon flatbed scanner for £50 at RRP. That's the first one I looked at, other makes may be cheaper. I've seen cheaper brand name printer/scanners in various supermarkets on offer too.

 

[bazzabear]

You probably already know this, but make sure that any method you use doesn't subject the original to too much heat, or it can destroy the image.

 

[Greebo]

Canon CanoScan LiDE 220

Scans at 4800 x 4800 and is a current PC Magazine editors choice for flatbed scanner for archiving photos. Around £60.

Then you can edit and re-scan where necessary to get the best quality.

 

[Donnie Fisher]

All joking aside, a decent modern phone will be able to focus near enough at a resolution that beats the original scan print out. Plus phones have the tools to adjust the exposure too

 

[i know nothing]

You probably already know this, but make sure that any method you use doesn't subject the original to too much heat, or it can destroy the image.

So true, I believe the paper is akin to fax paper and heat sensitive.

 

[Donnie Fisher]

Yes, don't do what my friend did... Leaving it in his trouser pocket, washing it, then trying to take out the wrinkles by ironing it...