Best small Netbook replacement?

Associate
Joined
1 Mar 2007
Posts
615
Location
London
I am not in the loop regards the latest small notebook/netbook offerings. I am looking to replace my EeePC901 (8.9" screen) as it too slow when there are mutilple windows a open, and does not always respond instanlt mine is the SSD version so I am running out of storage. Advice sought on a suitable replacemt.

I use it primarily for web browsing using a 3G dongle, word procesing etc. No games, no DVDs, no HD. Portablility is all important so max 1.5-1.6 kg and say max 11" screen? I usually have access to a wall plug so battery life is not too critical but it nice to have more than a few hours. I need Windows 7, 2GB ram,something better than an Atom, HD size unimportant (I am survivng on a 12gb SSD!) and more than the 1024x 600 res I have at the moment.
I have around £400 to spend, maybe a little more for something special.

What should be on my short list?

Cheers
 
Last edited:
Acer 1810, quite pricey but I'm pretty sure it can be found for £400. 11.6", 4GB RAM, 250GB HDD, Intel Pentium dual-core CULV, 8 hours battery life.

Generally got very good reviews. Alternatively Acer Ferrari One if you can look past the styling.
 
As above, although I'd also throw in the Toshiba T110 series - you'll probably find the keyboard and trackpad better on the Acer though.

Also, if price is an issue (the 1810 is more like £450) - also consider the Acer 1410 and Packard Bell Dot.

The 1410 is almost the same spec as the 1810 but with less ram and only a Celeron Dual Core - although still better than an Atom. It has a smaller capacity battery compared to the 1810 so about 5-6hrs battery.
The Packard Bell Dot is a re-branded 1410 - I personally thought the trackpad and aesthetics were better than the Acer branded one though...

Those 2 above can be had sub £400.
 
As above, although I'd also throw in the Toshiba T110 series - you'll probably find the keyboard and trackpad better on the Acer though.

Also, if price is an issue (the 1810 is more like £450) - also consider the Acer 1410 and Packard Bell Dot.

The 1410 is almost the same spec as the 1810 but with less ram and only a Celeron Dual Core - although still better than an Atom. It has a smaller capacity battery compared to the 1810 so about 5-6hrs battery.
The Packard Bell Dot is a re-branded 1410 - I personally thought the trackpad and aesthetics were better than the Acer branded one though...

Those 2 above can be had sub £400.

I just bought a red Acer 1810t (the SU4100 version) as a "refurb" for £369 delivered. I'll try and remember to report back when it arrives :)
 
I'm a week into owning an 1810TZ. I started off looking at a cheap 1366x768 Aspire One 751, but allowed feature creep (and a dislike of Atom's potentially frustrating limitations) to drag me up above £400.

First impressions were mixed. Trackpad too small, screen good (if rather shiny, shiny) but perhaps a little too cramped at normal viewing distances. But I was soon won over and forgot that I spent a bit more than I really wanted to.

1) I have maxxed the trackpad sensitivity out and adjusted to using it with my thumbs for most basic functions when typing. That way I can keep my hands in one position. And multi-touch capability is superb for scrolling etc.

2) I have increased the default font size, making the machine more comfortable to use at arm's length (with my aging eyesight). While this partially negates the point of having a 1366x768 screen, the ability to easily adjust window zoom/shrink using a trackpad "pinch" means you can constantly adjust things to suit your immediate needs. I use this all the time now.

3) Battery life, at least so far, is superb. You just don't have to worry about it for hours on end.

4) The thing is effectively silent. The fan sometimes comes on noticeably for a few seconds at boot-up, but in normal use you just never hear anything worth mentioning.

5) Gaming is, as expected, limited. Some messing about with my Steam catalogue shows Osmos working very well, Defense Grid working "ok" but not well at default settings, and older stuff like Return to Castle Wolfenstein and even HL2 working smoothly at good detail settings. Personally I'd prefer even worse gaming performance, because I wanted a machine with fewer distractions. :-)

6) Keyboard is... ok. I like a nice satisfying keyboard to type on, but the travel on this is too shallow to give that kind of tactile feedback. It isn't a problem, and the full size layout is very easy to use, with no finger-fumbly problems, but I would happily have seen this machine a few mm deeper with that distance put into optimising the keyboard. Don't let this put you off, but also don't expect miracles.

7) Overall performance isn't a problem. The dual core does get maxxed out by some tasks, but in general use the machine feels like a 'normal' desktop device. My fear with an Atom machine was that I'd be buying a disposable device (and you are, really) leading to a "buy cheap, buy twice" thing. The 1810TZ (or anything in this class) should be a device with a much longer lifespan, and may be cheaper in the long run.

8) Build quality has no obvious problems. I wouldn't want to test how rigid the case/screen is, but then that's true of most laptops. I'm using two nested jiffy bags as a case which bulks it out a lot, but buys me some peace of mind. Hopefully the low mass/inertia will mean it's a fairly resilient machine if I ever do test its ability to survive a fall.

Anyway, I was a netbook-style virgin before this, so I was very impressed by the overall size and weight. It's so refreshing after years of lugging a much heavier laptop around. I do miss the bigger screen (my 6 year old laptop is a 14" 1400x1050) but the overall package is very good indeed, and I'd definitely buy it again.

Hope this helps someone.

Andrew McP
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that was a great help. I am plumping for the 1810Tz, seems ideal for what I need it for. I got a good 18 months out of my EeePC and am happy that.
Cheers
 
Thanks, that was a great help. I am plumping for the 1810Tz, seems ideal for what I need it for. I got a good 18 months out of my EeePC and am happy that.
Cheers

Got mine this morning, really happy with it, nice solid little laptop.

Battery does genuinely seem to be good for around 8 hours too.

It feels nice and nippy and given its price point, very well made.

I'm very happy with mine so far :)
 
I'm a week into owning an 1810TZ. I started off looking at a cheap 1366x768 Aspire One 751, but allowed feature creep (and a dislike of Atom's potentially frustrating limitations) to drag me up above £400.

SNIP

Anyway, I was a netbook-style virgin before this, so I was very impressed by the overall size and weight. It's so refreshing after years of lugging a much heavier laptop around. I do miss the bigger screen (my 6 year old laptop is a 14" 1400x1050) but the overall package is very good indeed, and I'd definitely buy it again.

Hope this helps someone.

Andrew McP

Thanks, it did.. I was looking for some real world comments. I think I'll sneak one of these past the Mrs now :)
 
A couple of niggles to add. First, when using this machine on your lap the weight of the screen compared to the body makes it feel a bit unstable. On a desk this isn't a problem at all, but typing on your lap can be a bit on the wobbly side.

Secondly, I am having second thoughts about the totally flat keys now I've done more typing. I thought I was getting used to it, but after a few days without using the mahcine I just did some typing on it and realised my fingertips miss the immediate 'location' feedback you get from standard keyboards with a bit of dip in them. It's quite a subtle thing, but it definitely makes a difference to my typing confidence. Maybe I can get the dremel out and hollow them out just a touch? :-)

Again, neither of these are deal breakers, and as a highly portable machine this is a very impressive package. It's just that -- as ever -- all machines seem to have some weak points, just to annoy you. And perhaps to make you buy another one later on. :-)

Andrew McP
 
I've got an NC10, i did have acer aspire one however it was too slow. I'm guessing becuase it never had a proper hard drive.
 
Back
Top Bottom