21 Apr 2008 at 08:06 #1 therubble therubble Associate Joined 5 Jan 2004 Posts 751 Location Norfolk Im tempted by VMWare fusion at the moment, just wondered if that's a sensible option to go for?
21 Apr 2008 at 08:33 #2 ringo747 ringo747 Soldato Joined 1 Feb 2006 Posts 8,188 I have used both Fusion and Parallels, like Fusion better.
21 Apr 2008 at 09:13 #3 Beepcake Beepcake Soldato Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 3,896 Location Cheshire ringo747 said: I have used both Fusion and Parallels, like Fusion better. Click to expand... Ditto, although I haven't tried parallels for a while.
ringo747 said: I have used both Fusion and Parallels, like Fusion better. Click to expand... Ditto, although I haven't tried parallels for a while.
21 Apr 2008 at 14:58 #4 RoleyBirkin RoleyBirkin Associate Joined 24 Aug 2007 Posts 781 Location UK, South coast Using Parallels. Seems ok so far, apart from a Windows activation problem I had initially.
21 Apr 2008 at 15:30 #5 therubble therubble Associate OP Joined 5 Jan 2004 Posts 751 Location Norfolk I'm thinking running fusion with XP inside may be the best approach, I don't really have any need for Vista, not as a developer anyway.
I'm thinking running fusion with XP inside may be the best approach, I don't really have any need for Vista, not as a developer anyway.
21 Apr 2008 at 15:39 #6 1337z0r 1337z0r Associate Joined 25 Nov 2006 Posts 1,906 Location Birmingham Fusion for sure, prefer it over parallels plus unity works great.