Would you say that MS Office 2007 is a big resource hog?
Thunderbird is free, so I say its better than outlook.
Same applies for the rest of the suite. If you just wanna do "normal" stuff then openoffice is best. I have never not been able to do something on openoffice, plus its legally free.
Hmmm, well I thought sod it and installed MS Office again.
I use thunderbird at the moment for email, I find Outlook is hard to set up for AOL and I could never get it to send emails![]()
Most of Outlook's functionality speeds ahead from Exchange based servers, with that it is in a world of its own.
From what based servers? So no use to me for checking my email with AOL I guess?
Are you being serious?! Outlook 2007 (or 2003 for that matter) is about 1 million light years better than Thunderbird....Thunderbird is a basic email client, Outlook is a fully blown email/work/will do your grocery shopping automaticaly heavyweight.
Same goes for Office 2003/2007. Then again, I speak from a corporate viewpoint.
Office 2007 is brilliant, especially with MOSS 3.0. To answer the OP post, there is no alternative, if you want the essentials, sure OpenOffice etc, but Office 2007/2003 is king of the hill from a corporate perspective anyway. Anyone who says otherwise is deluded.
nail on head springs to mind.
your thinking from the coporate thing, im looking at it from a humble normal bloke wanting to send a few e-mails & write a few documents etc