Associate
fozzybear said:I'll look forward to watching this if someone can record it on FRAPS. Those 50klicks chaps are strong favourites though!
Wont the server have battlerecorder? That way we can all see it after the match.
BF2 50Klicks vs OcUK match
- Thread starter geeza
- Start date
Wont the server have battlerecorder? That way we can all see it after the match.
Soldato
GlasgowTitan said:
Yay! lets hope so, I want to see me getting buggered eight ways through sunday
Oh look its sanbro driving an APC up my ASS!
Soldato
GlasgowTitan said:
Yeah, probably. That'll rule me out of watching any highlights though as I won't be playing in the match. I'm kind of missing this game.
MoNkeE said:Agreed on the first part. If someone breaks the rules, they need to be banned. Normally these things are done by more than one admin - so chances of Chopchop upsetting just the one admin is quite slim
-RaZ
i was borderline on breaking their no attacking red circle bases rule, since i bombed the satalite scanner in the mast of the ship, which was away from where people spawning. and shot the carrier gunner who kept shooting at me while chasing a jet.
i am not banned from either of their servers (i just checked), but like i said before: im guessing they dont want me to play because i complained at their clan members continuous flaming to me in a thread i made on their forums. i was unbanned on the first page, so all was done and dusted, but the flaming and insults carried on for another 3 pages..
Associate
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 353
Tbh ChopChop/Zipp0r
I think it was more the fact that instead of taking your ban gracefully, apologising and getting back to the game, you proceeded to complain about and debate the rule, not only on the 50K forum but also on an EA forum (to which MG replied)
The rule you broke states 'ONLY SPEC OPS allowed to attack red circles to take out Strategic targets' you broke this then complained that you were banned.
Not only that but i recall you being abusive a couple of days before you were banned in game. You also proceeded to post on the EA forum defending PH1L who was caught cheating on our server and had his stats wiped. What impression of you do u think all this combined gives other people of u?
Obviously you are no longer banned from the servers, but just have a think about why you were flamed?
I think it was more the fact that instead of taking your ban gracefully, apologising and getting back to the game, you proceeded to complain about and debate the rule, not only on the 50K forum but also on an EA forum (to which MG replied)
The rule you broke states 'ONLY SPEC OPS allowed to attack red circles to take out Strategic targets' you broke this then complained that you were banned.
Not only that but i recall you being abusive a couple of days before you were banned in game. You also proceeded to post on the EA forum defending PH1L who was caught cheating on our server and had his stats wiped. What impression of you do u think all this combined gives other people of u?
Obviously you are no longer banned from the servers, but just have a think about why you were flamed?
Last edited:
Deliverance said:
yea, see now your making stuff up and still ignoring things i said.
firstly i was in NO WAY abusive to anyone while playing
to say otherwise is wholly ficticious!!i asked was it a fair rule to be kicked from the game for bombing assets, everyone said no. ok i accepted that and i thanked a guy for removing my ban. but i recieved 3 pages of flaming and abuse towards me.
i asked on eauk forums and HERE in our bf2 thread, if people thought bombing assets was a valid and fair use of the plane and if it was considered base raping. i did not say anything against the server or admins at all.
the thread i made is still viewable on ea forums as well. http://forum.eagames.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=16018&highlight=bombing+assets
Deliverance said:
generally towards any statpadders... i dont think they need their stats wiping, if you see them doing it on your server.... just ban them and you dont have to deal with them again.
but if theyre using aimbots and what not, then maybe see about getting their cd key banned.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 353
Agreed, the flaming was unneccesary, but debating a rule which has been set previously wont get you anywhere. Im not gonna argue with you, but i know *** i saw. Please do not tell me im making stuff up or for that matter ignoring you, that is wholly fictious in itself. What would i have to benefit by claiming you were abusive when i dont even know you?
For reference, the exact rule according to the 50k forums is:
"No Basecamping. The spawncamping or attacking of any base (untakeable flag - identified on the map at the red area) will NOT be tolerated. Expect to be banned without warning for this. However, you are entitled to destroy an enemy tactical position e.g. Artillery, Command Hut, Radar etc. Your fire MUST be restricted to the target in question - no carpet bombing."
Whether this was rectified after your visit i do not know, but anyone who attacks an uncap carrier has always been kicked.
Whether you end up playing or not is of no concern to me. Admittidly, it would be nice to kick ALL you OCUK boys into Obvlivion instead of just 'most' of u. 
Should be a good game and look forward to it.
For reference, the exact rule according to the 50k forums is:
"No Basecamping. The spawncamping or attacking of any base (untakeable flag - identified on the map at the red area) will NOT be tolerated. Expect to be banned without warning for this. However, you are entitled to destroy an enemy tactical position e.g. Artillery, Command Hut, Radar etc. Your fire MUST be restricted to the target in question - no carpet bombing."
Whether this was rectified after your visit i do not know, but anyone who attacks an uncap carrier has always been kicked.
Whether you end up playing or not is of no concern to me. Admittidly, it would be nice to kick ALL you OCUK boys into Obvlivion instead of just 'most' of u.
Should be a good game and look forward to it.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 353
chopchop said:
As for PH1L, he wouldnt have got reported to EA for his tank/wall glitch tbh.....the main reason he was reported was because he claimed to be an official Dice patch tester. If you havent seen the video Tefty made i suggest you search for it, rather amusing.
Deliverance said:Agreed, the flaming was unneccesary, but debating a rule which has been set previously wont get you anywhere. Im not gonna argue with you, but i know *** i saw. Please do not tell me im making stuff up or for that matter ignoring you, that is wholly fictious in itself. What would i have to benefit by claiming you were abusive when i dont even know you?
For reference, the exact rule according to the 50k forums is:
"No Basecamping. The spawncamping or attacking of any base (untakeable flag - identified on the map at the red area) will NOT be tolerated. Expect to be banned without warning for this. However, you are entitled to destroy an enemy tactical position e.g. Artillery, Command Hut, Radar etc. Your fire MUST be restricted to the target in question - no carpet bombing."
Whether this was rectified after your visit i do not know, but anyone who attacks an uncap carrier has always been kicked.
Whether you end up playing or not is of no concern to me. Admittidly, it would be nice to kick ALL you OCUK boys into Obvlivion instead of just 'most' of u.
Should be a good game and look forward to it.
msn me and tell me what abusive things i said then.
have your rules changed to allow bomb drops onto assets now then? you see its just not made clear to people.
Associate
Deliverance said:it would be nice to kick ALL you OCUK boys into Obvlivion instead of just 'most' of u.
Should be a good game and look forward to it.
should be fun
hope OCUK have a nice time in obvlivion.........
Should fun as long as everybody enjoys it
See you lot on the battlefield...
GJUK
Associate
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 353
chopchop said:
I cant recall *** u said, but it was on the ingame chat. I smoke and drink way to much to recall sumthing like that from the long ago
No they havent changed, you know its not allowed as you found out when you complained.
Tbh the 50k servers are the best you'll find in the UK for teamplay, admins and commanders precisely because of the rules they have. Not like the spawn die spawn die routine on Oman for example, because someone is bombing the carrier (for wotever reason) or using jihad buggies every 10 seconds, you can go to any EA server for that.
Anyway, like u say, your ban was lifted and with Karkand and Sharqi on the game night there shouldnt be any carrier bombing issues.
Soldato
Can you please stop discussing the issue of banning, as it's not the reason this thread was created.
I'll see you guys in the streets
-RaZ
I'll see you guys in the streets
-RaZ
Associate
Hi all where and when are we going to practice any one got any ideas
Associate
Allrighty then!
Important!
I've now got 30 OcUK'ers listed. Numbers 1-20, you'll be joining the game at 7:30PM, numbers 21-30, if there's any spaces left after 8:30, join.
The reason for taking on 30 players is that some are bound to forget, and in that eventuality, you'll need some players to take their slots.
The password and final details will be sent out some time next week. When you recieve it, keep it secret (we don't want any gatecrashers, so to speak).
As for the subs, please, only join if there's less than 20 players on the OcUK team (should see in the server browser) after 8:30 PM.
The usual 50Klicks server rules apply, but, for the night, the commanders fighting rule will be dropped, but don;t get any ideas of playing that card in a normal public game.
If anyone needs to see the rules, you'll find them here:
http://www.50klicks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=821
Remember: This is meant to be a fun night, please make it so. We don't want to end up hating each other after the game.
I'll keep you posted with any updates, and I'm off to write an email to each of the 30 signed up, with Phil99 - your team leader's contact details.
Make sure to make some nice tactics!
Cheers!
Important!
I've now got 30 OcUK'ers listed. Numbers 1-20, you'll be joining the game at 7:30PM, numbers 21-30, if there's any spaces left after 8:30, join.
The reason for taking on 30 players is that some are bound to forget, and in that eventuality, you'll need some players to take their slots.
The password and final details will be sent out some time next week. When you recieve it, keep it secret (we don't want any gatecrashers, so to speak).
As for the subs, please, only join if there's less than 20 players on the OcUK team (should see in the server browser) after 8:30 PM.
The usual 50Klicks server rules apply, but, for the night, the commanders fighting rule will be dropped, but don;t get any ideas of playing that card in a normal public game.
If anyone needs to see the rules, you'll find them here:
http://www.50klicks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=821
Remember: This is meant to be a fun night, please make it so. We don't want to end up hating each other after the game.
I'll keep you posted with any updates, and I'm off to write an email to each of the 30 signed up, with Phil99 - your team leader's contact details.
Make sure to make some nice tactics!
Cheers!
the rules are why i aint comming.. the first one could lead to people being banned who have been shot down in an unlucky area (dog fight or whatever) or has spawned on their spec ops squad leader, without seeing where he'd run off to and forgetting to check.. so with no warning they could be banned and yet they did not have the intent. where as tk'ing for a vehical would just get you kicked?
i aint had a single tk for over a month, i have never tk'd with intent.. but i did get kicked for a bad spawn on my spec ops squad leader from another server with the much the same rules.. i wish you'd take intent into account when banning.
i aint had a single tk for over a month, i have never tk'd with intent.. but i did get kicked for a bad spawn on my spec ops squad leader from another server with the much the same rules.. i wish you'd take intent into account when banning.
Soldato
Hector said:
What part of the thread says, "please debate the rules of the server that's kindly being donated to us for a fun night"?
Leave it out - nothing to do with the thread. Goes to all of you who want to comment on rules; the rules are there to be abided by, not broken. You break 'em, you get kicked. You argue, you get banned; surely not that hard to understand? They're in place to help make it more fun.
END OF DISCUSSION.
-RaZ
keep your hair on. i asked about this in the week, i got no reply then and i may not get one now either. i'm not looking for a row but if i got banned for something unjust i'd be right up for one and so would many other people. clear up these areas and it'll reduce the arguments that keep happening.
END OF DISCUSSION
END OF DISCUSSION