Bioware - New game Teaser

Associate
Joined
19 Sep 2011
Posts
153
EDIT: It has been confirmed as being Command and Conqueer Generals. Trailer here - http://www.eurogamer.net/videos/command-and-conquer-generals-2-trailer-5


http://dailygamingnetwork.com/2011/11/22/biowares-next-game-what-could-it-be/

Trailers are in the link (don't know how to embed Youtube videos on here sorry). Doesn't reveal much.

Bioware-new-game-1024x583.jpg


They did a similar thing I remember last year (as referenced in the link too). A full reveal will be next month.

Time to speculate...

EDIT: Command and Conquer? Mercenaries? Army of Two?

http://kotaku.com/5862039/is-that-n...and--conquer-one-how-about-an-army-of-two-one

Is That New BioWare Game a Mercenaries Game? Or a Command & Conquer One? How about an Army of Two One?
Here's an interesting theory, hatched by an astute video game message-board poster: the new BioWare game that will be revealed during next month's Spike TV Video Game Awards is a Mercenaries game.

This is just a theory—EA's comment to us about it: "We don't comment on rumors or speculation"—but let's consider the speculation and gathered evidence:

NeoGAF message board user Nirolak notices that EA's Visceral Games label no longer lists a Los Angeles location. Nirolak theorizes that the L.A. studio is now part of EA's successful BioWare division, which mostly makes role-playing games. Strange fit.

The sharp-eyed Superannuation spies that one user-interface artist for EA lists on LinkedIn that she works for a BioWare studio called Victory Games, based in Marina Del Rey, near Los Angeles, which supports the idea that BioWare now has a team in the L.A. area. Victory Games was formed out of EA L.A. in 2010, ostensibly to work on the Command & Conquer strategy-game franchise.

Nirolak doesn't push the possible Command & Conquer angle and instead builds a theory based on the idea that Mercs Inc, a third person shooter that was going to be the next game in the Mercenaries franchise, was turned into a game in the Army of Two franchise and that that project could be this BioWare project.

The theory loses some of its strength when Nirolak says that the absurdly short teaser trailer for the new BioWare game looks similar in gameplay to this old Mercs Inc video demo. Don't most modern warfare games look like this?

The Mercs series has been all about over-the-top third-person combat set in an open world. It is distinguished by the ability for players to "buy" and call in air-dropped weapons and vehicles. The concept is "playground of destruction." It's the least BioWare-ish of the series being considered here. The Army of Two games are co-op shooters. The C & Cs are, more famously, overhead real-time strategies games and, based on their PC roots, perhaps the games closest to the pedigree of the formerly PC-centric BioWare.

The new VGA teaser trailer for this new game promises that the game is coming from a new BioWare studio. Game Informer, which ran the teaser image here, referred to the game as part of "BioWare's new franchise." New to BioWare or new to gaming? Something borrowed or something brand new?

We shall see what BioWare's up to by VGA night on December 10.




 
Last edited:
The pic looks fairly different than what the video shows.

Dec. 10th will be marked on my calendar.
 
The pic looks fairly different than what the video shows.

Dec. 10th will be marked on my calendar.

The pic and video both show some kind of current/modern warefare set in an arid location.

I'm staying pessimistic on this, it's claiming a "new direction with a new bioware studio" which could mean it's nothing like the other gloriously dialogue-heavy titles.
 
Last edited:
2 years ago this would have left me a bit foamy around the mouth. More than DA2 being average at best, it was the insight into the company that dragged them down in my eyes. The shopping list of DLC, the general laziness and cheap development and banking on essentially robbing die hard fans. The steadfast denial that anything had gone wrong.

ME2 worked, but I think it was a fine line. The stuff that was trimmed out could be forgiven(mostly because it was implemented rather badly in ME), but continuing in that direction, broadening the appeal, "lowering the threshold" as DICE would say, is going to be crossing that line. Let's not forget the terrible bridging DLC, Arrival.

I hope that Mass Effect 3 makes me eat my words, but I wont be preording it and I've little to no interest in anything new from Bioware.
 
BLASPHEMY ! I loved ME2, ok the customisation was not as complex as the first but it was still a cracking game. Also while Arrival wasn't exactly a great DLC it was still pretty damm good imo. LotSB was an amazing piece of DLC too.

The story and lore to the Mass Effect universe is immense and I fell straight into it. I am really looking forward to ME3 to see how they close this trilogy.

That said I don't know about the rest of bioware's catalogue DA I could never really get into so I never even tried the 2nd (Which sounds like I made a good call) I don't fanboi companies but I do fanboi games :D and Mass Effect has been one game that I honestly love (I even read the books and comics.... does that make me sad ? proberbly :( )
 
Back
Top Bottom