Bringing a DSLR on Holiday

2StepSteve · 7 Jul 2014 at 14:45

I really want to take a DSLR to Spain at the end of the month, but the thought of taking my 5DMK3 leaves me feeling sick. I'd have to keep it on me at all times as I wouldn't trust leaving it in a hotel room safe. The more I think about it the more I know that it would impede on the holiday, as this is not a photography holiday.

So what are my options?

I'm thinking a cheapish second hand body, such as the 50D. A lost cost fast prime 50 1.8 and perhaps a walk around zoom. I'm really regretting selling my 400D a couple of years back!

Any thoughts?

2StepSteve · 7 Jul 2014 at 15:35

I get what you are all saying, what's the point of ownership if you aren't going to bring it etc.

I already have Photoguard insurance with EU cover, but I still don't feel all that happy about taking it. If it's locked in a room safe and just say the hotel management open it with a spare key, it gets whipped out, where does that leave me insurance wise as I haven't been mugged and there's no sign of forced entry.

2StepSteve · 7 Jul 2014 at 16:12

JBuk said:
Read through your policy and see what it says

You'd have had to give them serial numbers and values anyways have you?

One thing to think if will the safe be large enough for all your gear?

They have all of the serial numbers and value.

It's a good point you've raised about the size of a typical hotel room safe, they are pretty small. The last room I stayed in had quite a large size one though, large enough for a body and two small lens.

It's all a bit of a pain to be honest. Having laid out money for the holiday I'm pretty skint to be purchasing a beater body. Especially as I want HD video capabilities as I'd like to make an attempt in producing a short scenic video while I'm out there. A 50D could run Magic Lantern on it without audio, but yeah still talking about +£250.

2StepSteve · 7 Jul 2014 at 16:47

I've just been reading through my insurance cover, I've highlighted in red areas that I think could be an issue if someone from the hotel has a second key for the safe.

What is Not Covered

1. The Excess as shown on Your Insurance Schedule.

2. Theft when the Property Insured is in a locked room or locked cupboard away from the Insured Location unless access is by Forcible and /or Violent Entry and You have complied with Security Requirements 3.1b as applicable.

3. Theft when the Property Insured is at the Insured Location unless involving Forcible and/or Violent Entry and You have complied with Security Requirement 3.2.

4. Theft when the Property Insured is Unattended.

5. Theft from an Unoccupied Insured Location.

6. Theft by a person or persons to whom the Property Insured is entrusted.

7. Theft when hired out by You to any other person, unless You are in attendance.

8. Theft from any building at the Insured Location which is not of brick or stone built construction with a tiled or multi layer roof and securely locked, unless specified in an Endorsement.

9. The matching of any parts of a set or collection, not the subject of Theft.

10. Unexplained Theft.

11. Depreciation on Laptops and Laptop Accessories over 18 months old.

3.1 Security requirements where the Property Insured is away from the Insured Location

Accidental Damage, or Theft of the Property Insured whilst the item of Property Insured is away from the Insured Location shall only be covered in circumstances

where:

a) the item of Property Insured is not left Unattended; or

b) the item of Property Insured is inside a locked room or locked cupboard, and any security devices have been made operational.

I read that as if there's no violent entry, you aren't covered as it's a unexplained theft? It would be my word against the hotel owner.

2StepSteve · 7 Jul 2014 at 16:55

GAC said:
silly question but what sort of hotel you staying in if you expect someone to have keys to the safes and empty them ? if its that bad i wouldnt be staying in there to start with.

I think I'm being paranoid, if I'm honest.

2StepSteve · 8 Jul 2014 at 10:55

Demon said:
I'm off to Spain shortly for nearly 3 weeks...

At the moment, I'm taking my DSLR + P&S to cover most stuff, and we are staying at my parents apartment, so have a bit more security.

However, at the back of my mind I keep wondering if a Sony RX100 is the perfect tool for the job, eminently pocketable with large enough sensor and an f/1.8 (at it's widest) lens... Around £300 with cashback.. That way I can take it to the theme parks and other attractions, keep it in my pocket and still be able to get creative and have full control..

I was just reading about the RX100 - Looks great, especially the mark 3. But then I notice the price! £600?! WUT!?

2StepSteve · 20 Jul 2014 at 02:08

I've decided to take it with me!

As exactly what's been said here, what's the point otherwise of ownership!

2StepSteve · 20 Jul 2014 at 03:28

Exactly, see you all in about 2 weeks. Bring tissues.

2StepSteve · 25 Jul 2014 at 11:57

schizo said:
Your ok as you have 3 cameras Raymond

This made me chuckle

I'm trying to decide now which lenses to take.

My 70-300L and the 24-105L will definitely have a place in the travel bag.

But which prime would you take out of Sigma 35mm, Canon 85mm or Canon 100L Macro?

Leaning towards the 35mm.

2StepSteve · 25 Jul 2014 at 13:49

Sh4rkie said:
Take the 35mm + 24/105l, leave the rest at home.

Hmm - A part of me thinks that the 70-300L would be very useful though, great focal range.

2StepSteve · 25 Jul 2014 at 13:58

Raymond Lin said:
But is it great focal range for your holiday.

If you are heading to New York then it would not be my choice. It depends where you are headed.

I see what you mean.

I'm heading to a beach location in Majorca but do plan to go on excursions.

If I go to a sea life centre I think I will be crying for the 70-300L.. hmmm.