Build vs Buy - Gaming PC

Associate
Joined
27 Sep 2024
Posts
3
Location
Manchester, UK
Been out of the game for 20 years. Looking to build a gaming rig around the £1000 mark. Been getting myself up to day with the current hardware, apparently raid 0 and overclocking aren't really things anymore.
Is it better value to build or buy pre built?
Can anyone advise on a good cpu/graphics card combination that fits into this price bracket? I'm guessing 4k gaming is out of the question at this price point.
I'm looking at a 750w psu, at least 32gb ram and 1tb storage. A fancy glass case and pretty lights would be nice too :-)

I used to know which speed of ram to get to match up with CPU clock cycles, motherboard bandwidths, but totally out of touch these days!
 
self build is always better, if you have the time to diagnose problems if/when they occur
prebuilts usually cheap out on some parts (usually ram/mobo/psu) but you have the return-to-base warranty for as long as it lasts

for £1k, you'd be looking at a rough build of: ryzen 7600, rx7800xt or rtx 4070 (non-super), 32gb ram
this will run 4k, but obviously not at ultra settings. more suited to high-refresh rate 1440p gaming, which is the sweet spot imo

My basket at OcUK:

Total: £1,042.90 (includes delivery: £0.00)​
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing 4k gaming is out of the question at this price point.
mickyflinn's tamzzy's build (7800 XT or 4070 non-Super) will get you playable framerates at native resolution in the majority of games, the other games you will need upscaling. It is a big ask for a 1K build though, so you're right that this is pushing it.

If you look at the charts on this page, it gives you a break down under 4K for each of the games tested, but note that they use the highest settings so you can do a bit better than the numbers quoted.

This is a good video for giving some context on what is possible and what to expect:
 
Last edited:
The only danger with self-build is when something goes wrong.
When you need to diagnose problems there are few ways to do it, so people usually resort to swapping things out. If you don't have access to some parts to swap out, then it can be really expensive and stressful process finding out what's wrong.
 
its always better and generally cheaper to build your own.
ive seen people saving north of £600 on the same spec alien wear, there is a few venders that are more fair when it comes to prices but your then forced into a spec they offer and not really the spec you want or need
 
mickyflinn's build (7800 XT or 4070 non-Super) will get you playable framerates at native resolution in the majority of games, the other games you will need upscaling. It is a big ask for a 1K build though, so you're right that this is pushing it.

If you look at the charts on this page, it gives you a break down under 4K for each of the games tested, but note that they use the highest settings so you can do a bit better than the numbers quoted.

i did have a bash at 4k with my 7800xt and it could do it, but mmmm sort of.
at 1440 its a bit of a monster for the price. on pair with the 4070s
 
self build is always better, if you have the time to diagnose problems if/when they occur
prebuilts usually cheap out on some parts (usually ram/mobo/psu) but you have the return-to-base warranty for as long as it lasts

for £1k, you'd be looking at a rough build of: ryzen 7600, rx7800xt or rtx 4070 (non-super), 32gb ram
this will run 4k, but obviously not at ultra settings. more suited to high-refresh rate 1440p gaming, which is the sweet spot imo

My basket at OcUK:

Total: £1,042.90 (includes delivery: £0.00)​
Thanks this is bang on the money. Any advantage of going R7 over R5?
Is this motherboard decent enough to handle any future upgrading?
I think the equivalent Nvid card is the 4070, is ray tracing all that? That seems to be where the Radeon cards really fall down.
 
Any advantage of going R7 over R5?
Not really, unless it's the 7800x3d

Is this motherboard decent enough to handle any future upgrading?
Yes but not really.
Basically the board is sufficient to handle the lower end chips, ie the x600, x700, x800 chips (so the 6/8 core chips)
However the vrms are not strong enough to handle the higher core count chips (12/16 cores)
If you're never going to need that amount of multicore CPU demands then the mobo is going to be absolutely fine.

I think the equivalent Nvid card is the 4070, is ray tracing all that?
Yes the 7800xt trades blows with the 4070 non-super
With respect to which one is better, the 4070 is more power efficient so you save some £££ with lowe leccy bills, and also nvidia cards tend to hold their value better in the used market. So over the lifetime of the card, they work out roughly the same.

As you said, ray tracing is better on the Nvidia cards, as well as them having better supersampling (DLSS Vs the current inferior FSR on the Radeon). If you do professional work then having cuda on the Nvidia card may also be useful.

In favour of the radeons is that the radeon's larger vram will always be useful over time for pure rasterisation performance.

tl;dr it's not a clear cut choice

Personally (ie, in my use) I don't have any use for ray tracing nor DLSS nor cuda so that's why I'm currently using a 7900XT (ex 3080 owner) and that the power draw of the 7900xt is the same as the 3080 so that factor (power consumption) is also a moot point for me.
 
Last edited:
Yes the 7800xt trades blows with the 4070 non-super

honestly i dont think that's right, in 3D mark there is only 1,000 points in it and my 4070s was very much overclocked.


as yoiu can see here ther 4070 none Super is behind by a good bit
 
Last edited:
honestly i dont think that's right, in 3D mark there is only 1,000 points in it and my 4070s was very much overclocked.
TPU's GPU database has the 7800 XT listed as faster than the 4070 in raster by 7% (HUB's 45 game benchmark had 6-8%, though it is over a year old).

If you look at several reviews that have large test suites and compare multiple games, some games do favour nvidia, some favour AMD and with ray tracing enabled the 7800 XT is often a big chunk behind both cards.

Overall (raster, ray tracing, upscaling, power efficiency, price), they're considered competing cards, since the 7900 GRE is more commonly matched to the 4070 Super.
 
i have owned both, and feel there no too fare apart but the 4070 is a big drop on both.
that said i do have one of the better cards
It might be influenced by the games you play, for example: in HUB's video, there are games that the 7800 XT is over 20% faster than the 4070 (across all resolutions). You do need higher-end CPUs to pull the best performance from nvidia cards too, or at least you used to.
 
It might be influenced by the games you play, for example: in HUB's video, there are games that the 7800 XT is over 20% faster than the 4070 (across all resolutions). You do need higher-end CPUs to pull the best performance from nvidia cards too, or at least you used to.

i had a 7800x3d but yes i do play a very limited pallet of games
 
im running a 7800xt and running every thing great at max settings on 2560x1440p and i play a lot of games, i do have a 7800x3d cpu as well though but the card was great on my old ryzen 5700x as well :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom