BX2 or BXFX as surround?

Associate
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Posts
2,174
Location
Behind you
Hi:)

I'm replacing my front speakers on wednesday to a pair of Monitor Audio RX6's. Sould I replace my side BXFX's with the BX2's I'm replacing the RX6's with? Or still use the FX's as the sides? The AVR is an onkyo NR818.

Ta:)
 
BX-FX will be more diffuse and less directional than BX2's which for surround is ideal.

If you want to run 7.1 use the BX2's as surround back channels, these 2 channels are designed to be conventional monopole speakers, providing you can fit them in.
 
Okay, seriously... There's nothing to stop someone using monopole speakers as rear surrounds,. In fact, with SACD it is recommended but for different reasons. Also, if you look at the recommended layouts for DD and DTS home cinema it appears to show monopole speakers for the surrounds, and many will take that at face value without investigating further. But as with so much in life, one size does not fit all. THX takes a different approach. Their site shows dipole surrounds for the sides.

Good monopole speakers such as the BX2 need space between the speaker and listener for the sound field to develop. Now, bear in mind that if you actually read Dolby's description of the role of the side (rear) surround speakers then it says "The surround speakers create a lifelike sense of spaciousness, providing the ambient sounds for a movie or audience reactions in a concert video" So they're telling us that if you have a living room the size of a football pitch (I'm joking, but you get the point) then you can use monopoles because they'll be far enough away to be heard as ambient rather than pin point.




In the real world of a typical UK livingroom we just don't have that much space. In these situations dipole speakers are far more effective. They produce the ambient diffuse sound required at a much shorter listening distance.


So why so so many surround kits come with monoplole rears?..... Well, much of it is down to cost. It's cheaper to make a smaller range and use the same speaker all round. Monitor Audio is one of the few speaker manufacturers to make a dipole rear surround at a sensible price.
 
i have almsot the exact same setup

rx6
rxc
bxfx

i have a poor rear setup in the living room
no space between the wall and the sofa
and my bxfx (ideally needing a bit of distance between them and the back wall) are at 90 degrees and i know they would sound better at 110. i almost miss the rear

im not sure if for me bx2s would be better or worse, they would be at about 95 degrees as they could be right against the wall.. but it might make the difference, but to counter that they would only be 1-2 meters from listening

im not sure either TBH!!

im tempeted to pull the the sofa from the wall, it might also make the tv bigger, but then the distance to the fronts would be shrinking to 1.7 meters!

off topic.. did you try with and without bi amping?
i have a bi amp option too but am not using it

yamaha 1067
 
Last edited:
As you have both speakers there, why not try both configurations and see which you prefer?

I use KEF Q100 as my rears, I had MA BR-FX before and wasn't all that impressed. Either di-poles don't work well in my room or I just prefer mono pole rears.
 
Update: Had the RX6's a few days and as I'm running 'em in they sound better and better:) Osing a 60hz crossover to the sub, is that about right?
 
Last edited:
Update: Had the RX6's a few days and as I'm running 'em in they sound better and better:) Osing a 60hz crossover to the sub, is that about right?

i think i use 60 or 80, probably 60

out of interest, did you do a compare with and without bi amp?
 
Thread revival.

Just got an absolute bargain pair of new Monitor Audio BX6 floor standers. I've also just bought a BXW10 sub. Now just need the centre, rears and an AV receiver :D

So, per thread, what rears should I pick? The BXFX or BX2? Usage will be 70% home cinema and 30% music.

Room plan...
RUWKJEC.jpg.png
 
Back
Top Bottom