Hi All
Just a quick question about image quality.
I wont to get my sky going from downstairs to my new 40" LCD. And I was just wondering if someone could tell me which one of these is the best way to do it...
Either bye the skyfunk SL3 audio video sender and a sky remote and do it wirelessly?
Or bye a sky magic eye with remote and some coaxial cable with 2 male connectors and connect it from the eye to the skybox via the second RF input?
Which one of these will provide better quality? I think it will be the wires why but I have read the video sender is good. And doing the cables is a lot more work
Thanks
XD-3
Just a quick question about image quality.
I wont to get my sky going from downstairs to my new 40" LCD. And I was just wondering if someone could tell me which one of these is the best way to do it...
Either bye the skyfunk SL3 audio video sender and a sky remote and do it wirelessly?
Or bye a sky magic eye with remote and some coaxial cable with 2 male connectors and connect it from the eye to the skybox via the second RF input?
Which one of these will provide better quality? I think it will be the wires why but I have read the video sender is good. And doing the cables is a lot more work
Thanks
XD-3
using coaxial cable and a sky TV link as it was the cheaper option and I think with it being cable not over air then I will get less signal degradation.