We'd be fine. We always have been. We always will be.
<ocuk>
I suppose sending all the immigrants back would ease our food demands.
</ocuk>
we would survive theres plenty of land to grow crops and an ocean full of fish.
Yes we can feed ourselves easily - farming methods are far more intensive than during the war and even if it meant turning over more land to agriculture or rationing of some sort it could be easily achieved.
The thing that would trip us up is energy / fuel - intensive farming (as well as everything else) uses loads of it and we don't have much since they shut the pits.
According to the CIA world factbook, we produce 60% of the food we need in this country from 2% of the population. I'm sure if more land was turned over to farming and we wasted less, we'd be fine.
According to the CIA world factbook, we produce 60% of the food we need in this country from 2% of the population. I'm sure if more land was turned over to farming and we wasted less, we'd be fine.
The UK cannot fend for itself. We do not have enough oil, gas, coal, uranium etc. Without fuel, modern farming methods are pretty much defunct.
I looked up what you were allowed to buy during WW2 rationing. It's bloody scary. 500g of meat, 100g of bacon, 1 egg, 25g of cheese (amongst other things) a weekMight be worth starting a diet if only to shrink your stomach now so you can cope if they do reintroduce rationing...
We do however have enough military strength to acquire what we need from others though, if we where ever desperate enough.
Yes but that is wartime rationing.
Yes we have been producing far more food than we actually consume/export and have been destroying the excess
Well, if it came to an every-man for himself situation at this present time we wouldn't, we would most likely be those getting taken from. Also again, bringing a wartime factor into this is just meh -- I doubt the population figures would hold up when millions are being killed.
No.doesn't the uk have a ridiculously high portion of the worlds supply of uranium as it goes? something ludicrous like 40%?