Can i get by on a GTS ?

[<F0rb>]

,.

 

[Zefan]

How would an x1650 do on wow, at that res ?

On medium settings, absolutely fine.

 

[Margaret]

I'm happy to pay the £30 for the BFG'ness now, i don't overclock and it's faster aswell.

Well it's the same really, it just comes pre-overclocked (well I think it does), it's exactly the same in every other way.

 

[<F0rb>]

,.

 

[chaparral]

Might just hold off then. I might pack Pc FPS's in soon anyway.

i'm happy to spend £200 on a card that will run that res, not always on high settings, for most games.

How about looking out for a secondhand ATI x1900xt-x or x1950xt-x (512mb)...these normally go for between £80 to £110

 

[melbourne720]

I was considering this monitor / gfx card combination. I think that at the native res of the 2407 the GTS 640MB would be sufficient - as anyone out there running with this setup?

 

[queamin]

At that res don't get the 320 the 640 will give you more headroom,yes the 320 will play a few games at that res but it will start to struggle and when new games come out i think the gap between 320 and 640 will widen at that res.

 

[straxusii]

I'd go for thr 640mb gts, you need the extra ram for the high res.

Im running same on a dell 27" monitor and its fine at 1900x1200, when I need the extra power in the future I'll buy another and SLI

 

[Kezmo]

I was considering this monitor / gfx card combination. I think that at the native res of the 2407 the GTS 640MB would be sufficient - as anyone out there running with this setup?

Yup, GTS640 is fine at native ress and high detail for all the games ive played.

 

[C64]

The 320 i had struggles at 30fps on cs source 1600-1200 everything maxed
my new evga 8800 gts 640mb flies at same settings 100 fps.