Canon 5D still a viable camera?

[ajf]

Recently updated my 350d to a 600d and am happy with it, but am getting itchy fingers for a full frame camera having seen the results here. Particularly depth of field effects.

Debating on a used 5D (original) and maybe a 50mm and/or 85mm fixed lens.

What are your thoughts?
Is the 5D still a decent camera against modern equipment, even the APS-C 600D?

Would mainly be used for static shots, nutmhow does the AF cope with rapid tracking?

Thanks
Andrew

 

[ajf]

Thanks for the comments. The AF isn't a major issue anyway as I said for the intended use, although interesting comment by Ksanti. If that is correct then it should be OK as found the 600D has been fine for tracking so far.

Regards recomposing, pretty much do that with all static images already. Never really got the hang of flipping around the various focal points all the time

Assuming the comments about LCD/screen relate to the viewing screen on the back and not the sensor? If so again not a huge issue. Until 2 months ago I was using my 350D which I think had a very similar screena dn it did the job on the occasions I really needed to check an image.

Must say the larger one on the 600D has been useful though!

Think I might look around and see what prices I can get one for. Tempted to spend just a bit more and get one from mpbphotographic as at least there is a small warranty period.

 

[ajf]

Appreciate the point about dof etc when recomposing after focusing, especially as this is one thing I want the 5D for.

I already have a 17-40 f4 L which I think should be OK but, yes, it was either the Canon 50mm f1.8 or 1.4 i had thought of or their f1.8 85mm, thoguh not sure how this stands up quality wise?