First of all congrats to City for winning another title.
With the team seemingly hitting their best form of the season and a treble beckoning I've been thinking about what it will take to overhaul them and if anyone can do it. After a middling start to the season by their standards, it has all come together in the last few months whilst everyone else has limped to their final league position. Arsenal's implosion seemed inevitable to some, United have laboured since January and Newcastle have over achieved in a first monied season. Liverpool are in transition, Chelsea and Tottenham are rudderless despite the former's embarrassment of riches.
City just seem to have a platform that can continue to dominate and leave the rest fighting for 2nd place. Its hard to argue that Pep is not greatest manager of this generation with his ability to build great teams in his image and his desire appears undiminished. They also have such a squad depth and board structure that means that the manager doesn't have to worry about how much of a transfer fee was paid for a player and therefore benching or dropping a £100m player is not an issue. He's been allowed to spend a year teasing Grealish into the team, can protect developing talent like Foden and Haaland whilst being able to jetison players who are easily good enough for top 4 but maybe not good enough for Pep.
Are we in an era where only state owned clubs with unlimited funding can contend? Does monopoly become a real risk if FFP is not fully implemented and potentially tightened?
My own team Manchester United are realistically miles off City. I can't see us challenging them within 2 seasons and fear for the FA Cup Final. Even if Qatar are successful ( and part of me will die if they are) then The gap to close is vast.
Anyone else think City can be challenged domestically or even in Europe.
With the team seemingly hitting their best form of the season and a treble beckoning I've been thinking about what it will take to overhaul them and if anyone can do it. After a middling start to the season by their standards, it has all come together in the last few months whilst everyone else has limped to their final league position. Arsenal's implosion seemed inevitable to some, United have laboured since January and Newcastle have over achieved in a first monied season. Liverpool are in transition, Chelsea and Tottenham are rudderless despite the former's embarrassment of riches.
City just seem to have a platform that can continue to dominate and leave the rest fighting for 2nd place. Its hard to argue that Pep is not greatest manager of this generation with his ability to build great teams in his image and his desire appears undiminished. They also have such a squad depth and board structure that means that the manager doesn't have to worry about how much of a transfer fee was paid for a player and therefore benching or dropping a £100m player is not an issue. He's been allowed to spend a year teasing Grealish into the team, can protect developing talent like Foden and Haaland whilst being able to jetison players who are easily good enough for top 4 but maybe not good enough for Pep.
Are we in an era where only state owned clubs with unlimited funding can contend? Does monopoly become a real risk if FFP is not fully implemented and potentially tightened?
My own team Manchester United are realistically miles off City. I can't see us challenging them within 2 seasons and fear for the FA Cup Final. Even if Qatar are successful ( and part of me will die if they are) then The gap to close is vast.
Anyone else think City can be challenged domestically or even in Europe.