Would you be better off with an X2 CPU? One core to feed each GPU? Unless you already have a spare Vista install I guess?This is close to what I got:
Socket 939 SLI motherboard = £35
AMD A64 3200+ = £20
Heatsink = £10
1Gb RAM = £17
2x 8800GT 256mb = £92
PSU = £40
Total = £214
This would get you 9800ppd and therefore you would be one of the top 5 top producers on the team.
If i don't want a hard drive, how do i run xp from a usb stick? What size? Do you go through the normal install and just pick the usb stick as the destination for XP?
There's also a good chance that XP will kill a USB stick over time. Flash memory has a limited life and the Virtual Memory system in Windows writes to the disk lots and lots.
I suppose they are cheap enough that you could throw them away every few months, but it would be a bit of a lottery to find out which makes and models have the best life for a particular cost.
maybe he's thinking of how much power he will save not having to power up a hd all the time compared to a usb key. but then, running two graphics cards.... hmm....
Yes the power consumption would make a difference, a HDD consumes about 20 watts when its working flat out, which it wouldn't be doing. But I think the cost of constantly replacing a USB stick would be greater than the electricity cost of a HDD.
Do you reckon I can run 3 8800 GTS off a single core duo processor or will it not be enough the feed the GPUs? (i.e. only 2 cores therefore only 2 GPUs).
The reason I ask is a mate is getting rid of a mobo with 3 PCIEx16 slots and I feel the need to buy it off him Trouble is I wasn't able to get the E8200 I wanted and brought a cheap Core 2 Duo instead.
Depends on the OS - if you're using Vista it should be fine I'd think - if it's XP you probably won't get much better than with 2GPUs as under XP it generally uses a whole core of the CPU