Chinese computers to decide death sentences

Apart from the hacking / security issues , it makes sense.

178 year old Judges who still live in Victorian times handing out sentences is wrong and outdated.

A uniformity in crime punishment is a great , long awaited step forward.
 
I've been Googling for a list (There are 68 ) , but the Chinese are abit secretive. :rolleyes:

Apart from the ones listed above , "killing a panda" is one more that i found.

And quite right too.
 
It has the potential to be a great idea, as long as it has a bit of oversight. If it made a mistake (like giving someone charged with jay walking the death penalty) I would want to make sure that someone's there to say "hang on, that ain't right" rather than "sorry, computer says you die".

Otherwise I love the idea of standardisation in sentencing.
 
Lol, they should do it in the style of Family Fortunes. Get Les Dennis doing something useful as well.

edit - the origional source is the Daily Mail. *sighs*
 
ahhh yes give the machines the power to decide if we live or die.. that one always works out for the best ;)

i for one welcome our computer overloards and look forward to their fair judgement :D

Not a bad idea really in all honesty, but i work for a uni, and the decisions the computer makes about simple things like if a person should progress to the next year is sometimes a complete joke so it would definitely need to be watched
 
When I read about this yesterday the software doesn't have the final say, it's more to give the Judges a hand with sentancing so if there was a problem with the software then th eJudges can still say Yes or No. As usual the Daily Mail likes to make things sound worse than they actually are.

I personally think this is a good idea as it will help with sentancing and iirc the software is being filled with a hell of a lot of cases and verdicts to help it come to it's conclusion, the only thing it can't do is common sense.
 
More info (from wiki)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_People's_Republic_of_China

Excerpts:

Compared to some developed countries, death sentences are carried out very quickly in China. Usually the time from trial to execution is less than one year and sometimes only months. As of 2005, after a first trial (一審) concludes with a death sentence, the inmate has seven days to appeal to the provincial supreme court, which results in a second trial (二審). If the second trial concludes with a death sentence, it is carried out immediately.


China currently uses two methods of execution. The most common is execution by firearms, which uses an assault rifle to fire a single shot of a hollow point bullet designed to expand upon impact, resulting in the disintegration of the upper portion of the brain. Lethal injection was introduced in 1997. It differs from its application in the U.S. in that it is carried out in fixed locations as well as in specially modified mobile vans. As lethal injection becomes more common, debate has intensified over the fairness of relying on lethal injection to execute high officials convicted of corruption while ordinary criminals get executed by firearms. It is public opinion in China that lethal injection is an easier way for the condemned to die.

In the past the government collected a "bullet fee (子弹费)" from the relatives of the condemned.


The state controlled media, Xinhua News Agency, reported in March 2005 that the court has shown a human touch by allowing the execution of a condemned person to be delayed for one day so that he can have the chance to see his family one last time and bid them farewell.

Several features of capital punishment in China have drawn international criticism even from proponents of the death penalty in liberal states.

Pressure placed on local and regional bureaucracies under the auspices of the "Strike Hard" campaigns has led to the streamlining of capital cases; cases are investigated, cases and appeals are heard, and sentences carried out at rates much more rapid than in other states with developed judicial systems ostensibly based on liberal principles.

Capital punishment in China is not applied on a uniform basis. At times, the government will have so-called "strike-hard" (严打) campaigns aiming to warn the public against committing certain crimes. During such times, the courts will adopt a so-called "act fast, act hard" (从快从重) posture and will hand down punishment more severely and quickly.

Capital punishment is applied flexibly to a wide range of crimes, some of which are punishable by death in no other judicial system in the world. Economic crimes such as tax fraud have appeared routinely among the dockets of those receiving the death sentence, as have relatively small-scale drug offenses. Death is also frequently imposed on repeat offenders whose individual crimes would be considered relatively minor in most judicial systems, such as non-violent theft or causing incidental bodily harm that is not life threatening or debilitating. Capital punishment is also imposed on inchoate crimes, that is, attempted crimes which are not actually fully carried out, including repeat offenses such as attempted theft or attempted fraud. The recidivistic nature of the offenses, not their seriousness per se, is what is adjudicated to merit the capital sentence. One could hardly fail to note certain similarities between the executions of repeat offenders in China as part of the "Strike Hard" campaigns and the "three strikes" policy in California which puts repeat offenders behind bars for life even if individual offenses have been relatively minor.

Capital punishment in China can be imposed on crimes against symbols and treasures of the state, such as theft of cultural relics and the killing of pandas.
 
Back
Top Bottom