Can anyone else try this?
The sample image here is using sRGB (embedded) and when viewed in Firefox all the shades are visible but pay close attention to the vertical 3% bar especially.
Now view the same image side by side in Chrome & IE (I'm using v5 dev channel for Chrome) and open it in Windows Picture viewer as well.
Notice Chrome and IE both show weaker 3% grey and virtually non existent <3% blocks?
I disabled my LUT calibration to see if it's to do with my monitor being calibrated and the fact that Chrome/IE may not be colour managed but that doesn't change anything, yes the shades/colours are inaccurate disabling the LUT but the same weaker grey scale is there in IE and Chrome.
I've not tried Opera as I uninstalled it last night but I would imagine people would see the same here too.
It would appear that Firefox, Windows Picture Viewer, Photoshop etc all interpret the sRGB profile correctly whereas the other browsers do not?
Here's how it looks on mine:
The sample image here is using sRGB (embedded) and when viewed in Firefox all the shades are visible but pay close attention to the vertical 3% bar especially.
Now view the same image side by side in Chrome & IE (I'm using v5 dev channel for Chrome) and open it in Windows Picture viewer as well.
Notice Chrome and IE both show weaker 3% grey and virtually non existent <3% blocks?
I disabled my LUT calibration to see if it's to do with my monitor being calibrated and the fact that Chrome/IE may not be colour managed but that doesn't change anything, yes the shades/colours are inaccurate disabling the LUT but the same weaker grey scale is there in IE and Chrome.
I've not tried Opera as I uninstalled it last night but I would imagine people would see the same here too.
It would appear that Firefox, Windows Picture Viewer, Photoshop etc all interpret the sRGB profile correctly whereas the other browsers do not?
Here's how it looks on mine:

Last edited: