Cigarette Strength Guide

tres · 1 May 2009 at 15:40

Roll your own! Better for you (relatively), cheaper, much much nicer, without hundreds of chemicals added to cigarettes

Stolly · 1 May 2009 at 15:47

trescodrucey said:
Roll your own! Better for you (relatively), cheaper, much much nicer, without hundreds of chemicals added to cigarettes

Anyone smoking roll ups because they are worried about ingesting harmful substances needs a good slap.

nIckEl101 · 1 May 2009 at 15:48

as a now non-smoker for 25 days and still going strong!

my fave talour fags made were lucky strike lights, but i always smoked roll ups anyway.

Knubje · 1 May 2009 at 15:48

I heard smoking the purple veined monster is fairly good for you, less nicotine and tar. You also get the benefits of extra protein in your diet!

tres · 1 May 2009 at 16:16

Stolly said:
Anyone smoking roll ups because they are worried about ingesting harmful substances needs a good slap.

Hence my relatively comment.

LeeUK · 21 Jul 2018 at 12:46

Anyone know if Silk Cut White are still stocked in the UK, and if so which shops/supermarkets?

robfosters · 21 Jul 2018 at 12:52

LeeUK said:
Anyone know if Silk Cut White are still stocked in the UK, and if so which shops/supermarkets?

What is the point! Seriously, you might as well save your dough and just suck on a straw.

Just realised, holy epic bumpage batman! OP’s probably dead by now.

darkgen · 21 Jul 2018 at 12:58

Van Hellseek said:
Give up.

A somewhat trite reply but the only real logical option.

I smoked between 14 and 26. Absolutely and thoroughly enjoyed the experience. It is certainly a tough one to quit but it rewards quickly, starting with taste and smell!

ooops. aye....

Stolly · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:13

Smokers should be denied access to NHS services.

robfosters · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:19

Stolly said:
Smokers should be denied access to NHS services.

Let’s not start that one eh. It’s completely unworkable and morally wrong. So many problems with doing that, I wouldn’t know where to start.

randomshenans · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:23

Pork swords. Get smoking on those bad boys.

Chojin · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:24

Woodbine

Stolly · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:30

robfosters said:
Let’s not start that one eh. It’s completely unworkable and morally wrong. So many problems with doing that, I wouldn’t know where to start.

It’s a simple test. 3 fails in the space of 5 years and you pay for healthcare. Simple and morally right.

=XDC=FluphyBunny · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:34

It’s 9 years later in a smokers thread. Most the posters are probably dead by now.

asim18 · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:36

Stolly said:
It’s a simple test. 3 fails in the space of 5 years and you pay for healthcare. Simple and morally right.

So What if you've already paid 200k worth of tax in your life.

You telling me you have to pay again even though you've already paid?

asim18 · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:43

Fat people are a bigger issue tbh. At least smokers can still work. Fat people get sustained at the expense of everyone else because they can't even get out of bed without a forklift rental.

robfosters · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:44

Stolly said:
It’s a simple test. 3 fails in the space of 5 years and you pay for healthcare. Simple and morally right.

Its not morally right. When you refuse to treat people, you’re not only hurting them but innocent people around them. For example, is it right to deny lung cancer treatment to a 30 year old mum of two because she hasn’t been to quit smoking? Is it right to condemn those children to losing their mum?

M1k3H · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:47

Stolly said:
It’s a simple test. 3 fails in the space of 5 years and you pay for healthcare. Simple and morally right.

How about a runner or cyclist who hurts his knees/legs/has an accident due to the exercise?

Em3bbs · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:54

Stolly said:
Smokers should be denied access to NHS services.

Smokers pay loads of tax and die earlier. We should celebrate them if anything, they are paying for us!

darkgen · 21 Jul 2018 at 13:56

To attempt to police recklessness, whether due to extreme activities or the cyclist scenario example above would be too difficult to police. I would however question the morality of facilitating the prioritisation of a kidney transplant to an (ex)alcoholic as an example.