• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Cinebench R15 Extreme Edition: Unofficial mod

HeX

HeX

HeX

Soldato
Joined
20 Jun 2004
Posts
12,022
Location
Huddersfield, UK
CineBench15 has been around for years, created in an era where 4 core processors were the new norm. However, Maxon never updated it to cope with many-core processors. The 16-core and even 32-core processors these days can finish up the benchmark in merely seconds. That means that any Turbo can run 100% all the time as the benchmark finishes (too) fast. That's not entirely realistic as processors clock down after a number of seconds of full stress. With that idea in mind Guru3D's HWGeek started modding Cinebench. It's a simple trick, the Cinebench render resolution has been increased by fourfold, giving the benchmark a much longer and larger workload, this results into a more reliable score with the 64-threaded beasts we have available these days.

Note: This is an unofficial modded version of Cinebench 15 (it has a few some changed configuration files), this revision of software is not supported or distributed by Maxon.
Click to expand...

Download link from Guru3D

Google sheet with user scores here

If you wish to have your results added make a post with a screenshot of your scores and details of the system used.
 
Last edited:
well my system crashed 3 times haha, not a very stable overclock after all even though it was aida64 stable for 1 hour and i use it daily for gaming.

I managed to get 316....
 
R15-mod.png

:o
 
Tee Hee Johnson said:
Yikes, 396 from my 8700k @ 5.1Ghz
Click to expand...

What about the single core run? Would be nice if everyone could show their single core result along with the multicore so we can see another example of how core strength compares between CPUs now. But be warned it can be like watching paint dry. I went to make a cup of tea and the 4770K was still at it when I came back.
 
Danny75 said:
What about the single core run? Would be nice if everyone could show their single core result along with the multicore so we can see another example of how core strength compares between CPUs now. But be warned it can be like watching paint dry. I went to make a cup of tea and the 4770K was still at it when I came back.
Click to expand...

Here ya go Danny.

s5bb4n.jpg


Multithreaded 4.25Ghz all core with PBO
Single thread 4.35Ghz with PBO
Ram @ 3533Mhz Cas14
 
kitfit1 said:
Here ya go Danny.

Multithreaded 4.25Ghz all core with PBO
Single thread 4.35Ghz with PBO
Ram @ 3533Mhz Cas14
Click to expand...

Cheers, kitfit1.

You pipped my single result by 2 at fairly close clockspeed and squeezed 2 more points out of the multi compared to your previous. That's quite the RAM speed you've managed to get there as well.
 
Danny75 said:
Cheers, kitfit1.

You pipped my single result by 2 at fairly close clockspeed and squeezed 2 more points out of the multi compared to your previous. That's quite the RAM speed you've managed to get there as well.
Click to expand...

With the score between runs being that close Danny, a margin of error has to be taken into account. The thing that has struck me though is moorhen2's multi score of 599. Considering the cpu had to be run at 5.2Ghz to get that score, the score itself is very unimpressive. I'm 100% shure that if my 2700x could run the same bench at 5.2Ghz it would leave the 9900K in the dust.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom