Cisco - PE MPLS QoS - Flexwan vs SIP-200/400

Mr.Stu

Mr.Stu

Mr.Stu

Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
2,413
Hi guys,

This ones aimed at the server providers folks!

Looking at the above options to expand L3 QoS capability within a Cisco 7609. Has anyone had experience with either.

Current research suggests SIP is the way to go as Flexwan (enhanced) only support the pa-2fe-fx cards, giving a total max density of only 4 x 10/100 ports.

If I was to go down the SIP-200/400 route (along, I assume I would have no problems vlan'ing off single gig ports and applying QoS policies across sub-interfaces?

Any input appreciated :)
 
Thanks - was hoping for a detailed response like that!

I assume you normally just use basic marking and policing (i.e. mls xxx.xxx) on l2 line cards - i.e. x6748's. Is this normally sufficient to for voice/real-time traffic in a PE-CPE scenario?

Cheers mate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom