Computer overclocks badly

Soldato
Joined
4 Jan 2005
Posts
15,014
Ok, this is going to take a while for me to type down. ><

Around January, I bought a completely new system, pre-built. The primary components were:

Core 2 Duo E6300 1.86ghz
MSI 975x Platinum Edition motherboard
2x1GB Elixir DDR2 PC667

The power supply and graphics card were very generic items, so I threw them away and replaced them with a X1900XT and an Enermax Noisetaker 485 watt power supply.

Fast forward some time later, I decide to try and overclock the system. I did this by raising the FSB in 5 at a time, which worked fine up until 367FSB, which gave me a 2.67ghz speed overall, and a 700 or so mhz ram speed. Any higher (even with vcore at 1.28-1.3), and the computer would refuse to post, which was incredibly disappointing, especially as I invested in an Arctic Freezer Pro 7 just to have fun with the Core 2 Duo. I have seen many people reach 3ghz and beyond on just air alone. Slight annoyance aside and a weak self-assurance that the cooler would extend my relatively untaxed processer by millenia, I left it alone with a slight hunch that maybe, just maybe it was my ram holding it back.

Fast forward to last week; Gibbo posting about the deal where 2GBs of GEiL PC6700C4 is being old for mere peanuts. I thought it would be a good idea to invest in more ram now that games like UT3 and Crysis is on the horizon, so I purchased 4GBs of the memory (other 2GB I ordered later after the first 2GB, it comes tomorrow) and took the old (elixir) ram out. This would mean I have only the superior ram in it, which with its promising performance and higher speed surely should help my PC overclock better.

Or so I thought. The bad thing was, putting the new ram in has overall made my PC even slower - I put the new memory in, put all my clock speeds at default (so I overclock from scratch with the new memory in) and set the GEiL timing rates to their intended settings in the BIOS - 4,4,4,12 with 2.1 volts and a 400mhz DDR speed which results in 800mhz memory speed as CPU-Z correctly shows. So far so good! At this point, the FSB still shows only 266mhz which is giving my processer its default 1.86ghz speed. With the old ram, I could push the FSB high enough that the speed hit 2.67ghz, but no higher than that or it would not post. But unfortunately with the new memory, the FSB will only go high enough for a 2.56ghz Core 2 Duo speed, any higher and I get failed posts and/or BSODs upon Windows loading the desktop.

What is making my CPU/computer give up so easily? Could it be the power supply, crud motherboard or something else? Or is there some certain part to the overclocking process I am overlooking? This is a problem that has been niggling away at me for a long time now; I sometimes go green with envy at posters with 3ghz+ 6300s in their sigs, knowing I can easily reach the same with my equipment but for some inexplicable reason, just can't. Later on down the road, the low processor speed is going to bottleneck the rest of the system, particularly the 8800GTS. If anyone here can help me find a solution (help me hit 3ghz at last!) then I would appreciate it a ton.
 
Lower the memory divider to 1:1. That way your memory won't start to overclock til you get to 2.8ghz.
 
Heeding your advice now Cob. I've set the divider to 1:1 which has made the DDR speed 533mhz and started overclocking. For baby steps I have just set the FSB to 271 (5 up from the default 266) resulting in 1.90ghz.

cpuzhi7.jpg


1.90ghz Core 2 Duo and 544mhz on the memory. I suppose from now on, I just up the FSB by 5 and test each time to overclock? Is there anything I should keep in mind during this process?
 
Last edited:
You sure about that? I thought core 2 duo stock vcores were at 1.28 :o My MSI 975x default settings must all be totally wrong.
 
Im at 1.4V for 387.5fsb 2712.5 Mhz

If I push fsb any higher I start to crash but the voltage seems really high already compared to others :(
 
Pajeh said:
Im at 1.4V for 387.5fsb 2712.5 Mhz

If I push fsb any higher I start to crash but the voltage seems really high already compared to others :(

well thats only 0.075v over stock. Im at 1.45v for my overclock and you should be fine up to 1.55v on air as long as your temps are good. Every processor is different so one person may be able to get 3ghz on stock volts where another processor needs 1.4v+.
 
So far, my computer is overclocking nice and smoothly. The FSB is now at 352 resulting in a 2.54ghz processer speed and 704mhz DDR speed. Tried putting the vcore at 1.31 for the first time since I got the computer and the extra stability it brings can be noticed - I haven't finished yet, but it hasn't gave me one single complaint so far. With the old memory, by the time I would be coming into 340+ FSB territory, the computer would give the occasional hangup or failed post. I think it's the lowered DDR setting (533 at stock setting) as well as the vcore changes that's really helping me here.
 
Not to be rash but I think you're being overly cautious.

If you have any kind of decent cooler then you should be able to bump vcore to 1.45V and set the FSB to 400. That gives you nice 800mhz memory on the 1:1 ratio and a respectable 2.8Ghz cpu. Of course I'd try pushing the FSB higher if possible.
 
Darg said:
Not to be rash but I think you're being overly cautious.

Couldnt agree more, at the moment your processor is running UNDER spec as far as voltage is concerned. even on stock cooling you can put the voltage to 1.4v and just watch the temps.
 
KNiVES said:
You sure about that? I thought core 2 duo stock vcores were at 1.28 :o My MSI 975x default settings must all be totally wrong.

1.325v is definately stock voltage mate... chuck it straight to 1.4v and take a look at your temperatures, haven't known a single C2D (and i've had quite a few!) get hot on 1.4v..

FYI, mines currently sat on 1.6v on air... although my cpu seems to run cool though... (60c load.. which ok, isn't cool, but for 1.6v it is ;))
 
For my E6300 to hit 3.15GHz (450FSB) i am still on the stock volts, everest is reading 1.3vcore, so it seems weird that it would be the voltage that is holding you back.

Cant go any higher as my RAM, by the looks of things, cant hack it.

Good luck with the o'c though.
 
schumi84 said:
For my E6300 to hit 3.15GHz (450FSB) i am still on the stock volts, everest is reading 1.3vcore, so it seems weird that it would be the voltage that is holding you back.

Your processor != his processor. They are all different and require different settings to attain whatever it is they can attain.
 
Darg said:
Not to be rash but I think you're being overly cautious.

If you have any kind of decent cooler then you should be able to bump vcore to 1.45V and set the FSB to 400. That gives you nice 800mhz memory on the 1:1 ratio and a respectable 2.8Ghz cpu. Of course I'd try pushing the FSB higher if possible.

I wish you were right, but this computer has a history of being overly sensitive. I am getting the same situation as I was a few months ago now.

Currently, I can hit 2.59ghz with the FSB set to 369. But if I set it to 370, it will not post at all. I have tried setting the vcore all the way up to 1.4 but it does not help. 369 and below is perfectly fine without any hitches, but as soon as it goes to 370 - it stops dead. :(

This CPU-Z picture is the max I can possibly attain.

cpuz2ns6.jpg
 
Last edited:
ubern00b said:
Your processor != his processor. They are all different and require different settings to attain whatever it is they can attain.

I realize this, its just that i bought mine at a similar time so they may have the same batch number so in theory could achieve similar results.

Just commenting on what could be achieved.
 
what temps at 1.4v, if under 60c, try more...

voltage:temp ratio also varies on different cpu's, my e6400 is stupidly cold (60°c at 1.6v :eek:... on air...) so the fact that you only have 1.4v going through it could probably be the cause.. of course it could just be the limit of the cpu, some are good, some aint...

The e6300 i had did 400x7 on stock volts, and did 475x7 on 1.375v, but then again, an e660 i had would get 400fsb with anything less than 1.5v... just luck of the draw..
 
Back
Top Bottom