• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Conroe SuperPI test

Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,692
Hello,

Just wondering if someone with Conroe could run 2 instances of 1MB superpi at the same time and see if their time decreases much. Curious to know what time it gets when each core is having to share the cache rather than 1 having it all exclusively.

I don't have a motherboard for my Conroe atm so can't run the test myself.

Cheers.
 
ns400r said:
You have to run the second instance from a copy. Can't run it twice from the same folder.

yeah as above just make a duplicate folder and run each EXE separately, I tested with my Opteron and score was about 0.5-1sec slower with both running at same time.

I read the Conroe SuperPI is a bit unrealistic since the single core has the entire 4MB cache to play with and doesn't need to page out to main memory as much, so just wondered what the hit was like with only half the cache available to it.
 
Gashman said:
interesting proposal, should in theory be two exact same times :confused:

yeah but I'm wondering if the time will be much slower (and closer to athlon) when the cache is being shared.

remember most programs these days aren't multithreaded so the main core in conroe is having 4MB cache to play with, but once multithreading becomes mainstream each core will only have 2MB effectively.
 
trojan698 said:
well it should be similar, you have to bear in mind that core 0 will be running all your the background processes which would increase the time slightly.

core 0 on the left, core 1 on the right

...

For some reason, when I try to run both super pi's at once, I get an error; 'not convergent in sq' although it's 24 hours prime stable so I assume it's a problem with super pi itself.

what is your time when you run it on its own? (a single instance)
 
Back
Top Bottom