Conroes: 2 or 4mb cache clock better?

Associate
Joined
5 Oct 2003
Posts
78
Is there any difference in the overclocking capability between the conroes with 2 and 4mb caches? Some comments I've seen seem to infer the 2mb ones are better, but that might just be me reading too much into things.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
24,560
Location
Amsterdam,The Netherlands
Nothing I have seen but it could be that the extra 2Mb cache creates a little more heat which can mean it fials the overclock sooner as it will run hotter :confused:

The big downside to a E6300 and E6400 is the low multiplier of 7x/8x

The best mobo there is struggles to go over 425Mhz FSB so with a E6300 that means a max clockspeed of 2975Mhz, well below what the CPU is capable of.
 

Ed

Ed

Soldato
Joined
28 Apr 2004
Posts
4,979
Location
Hastings
Dutch Guy said:
The big downside to a E6300 and E6400 is the low multiplier of 7x/8x

The best mobo there is struggles to go over 425Mhz FSB so with a E6300 that means a max clockspeed of 2975Mhz, well below what the CPU is capable of.
I was almost about to buy the E6400. Does this mean the E6600 is a better purchase then as I always end up clocking my CPU's in the end and want as long a life from it as possible?

I'm a bit out of the loop in terms of stuff like this...
 
Don
Joined
5 Oct 2005
Posts
11,155
Location
Liverpool
spinneR~uk said:
I was almost about to buy the E6400. Does this mean the E6600 is a better purchase then as I always end up clocking my CPU's in the end and want as long a life from it as possible?

I'm a bit out of the loop in terms of stuff like this...

E6600 are the best clocking, and you will get a long enough life to see you to your next big upgrade

Stelly
 
Back
Top Bottom