One thing I've noticed is that stuff seems to be less robust than it used to be.Do you believe that products have been purposely designed to break or become obsolete within a set time frame or is it just a conspiracy theory?
One thing I've noticed is that stuff seems to be less robust than it used to be.
Do you believe that products have been purposely designed to break or become obsolete within a set time frame or is it just a conspiracy theory?
No its a conspiracy theory pedalled by people who don't understand how things work.
You can still buy a washing machine that will probably last 15 years but you won't pay £200 for it, you will pay £1000 for it.
Annoying when it comes to clothing and footwear - one of the main trainers I've been wearing for years - the first pair I bought lasted in good condition for 50% of the time since I first bought them to now - while I'm on the 3rd pair since in that other 50% and the original pair are still just about surviving relegated to work use.
Dish washers have been around 7 years each before I've replaced, I've had to do some basic servicing, mainly blocked filters or failed pumps or the dispenser stopping working, but ebay and cheap parts kept them going.
No its a conspiracy theory pedalled by people who don't understand how things work.
You can still buy a washing machine that will probably last 15 years but you won't pay £200 for it, you will pay £1000 for it.
People look at these things far too simplistically. Labour costs have increased, regulations have increased, complexity has increased therefore points of failure have increased. People want to spend as little as possible so quality goes down.
The 30+ year old dining table in the OP was probably hand made by a craftsman and put together properly from solid timber, but would cost you several thousand, rather than the factory built mass-produced £50 honeycomb cardboard and plywood cheapo stuff you can buy today which lasts 18 months.
Yes it can and does happen. It's not a conspiracy theory, it's just misappropriated.
Apple are a very good example. They had to pay $113m after admitting they intentionally slowed down older iPhones.
![]()
Planned Obsolescence: Apple Is Not The Only Culprit
Apple just got smacked with a class action lawsuit after the tech giant admitted it slowed down older iPhones. This act is also known as planned obsolescence.www.forbes.com
![]()
Apple to pay $113m to settle iPhone 'batterygate'
The lawsuit argued the iPhone-maker slowed down device performance to make users buy newer models.www.bbc.co.uk