Convicted of a murder they didn't commit

Soldato
Joined
7 Dec 2012
Posts
17,613
Location
Gloucestershire
Three guys have been convicted of the murder of their fellow gangmember, who was, the court accepted, killed by a rival gang.


Some sort of Joint Enterprise law.

Quite clearly, these guys should go to jail. But surely it should be for the guns and the intent, rather than a murder that was at someone else's hand?!

Horrible law, this.
 
As Dis86 said, they directly contributed to it. Either way, gang people are in jail, that's only a good thing, right?
I would think that the same result from the more equitable method of convicting for things they actually did would be better in principle.
 
They 'actually did this' though, the prosecution would have got nowhere if the case didn't meet the fundamental requirements for murder
That would be the "horrible law, this" bit of the OP.

It's interesting that so many responses are happy with this because it's a good result (these guys absolutely should be jailed), with so little concern for the way the result was achieved.
 
strange law though if you're with a mate and you slap a cop who then tazers your mate and he dies do you get charged with murder? if a butterfly in the rainforest flaps it's wing and your nan has a heart attack should we kill it with fire?
In America, their Felony Murder law, which is similar to Joint Enterprise here (particularly this case), can see accomplices of people killed by cops as being guilty of murder.

Here's an article where police shot a guy in the back as he was running away and the guys in the car with him are charged with murder:

 
Back
Top Bottom