• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Core i5

i5 doesnt have a 6 month shelf life, the 32nm parts will only be bargain basement dual core parts initially, the "mainstream" i5 quads will continue to be manufactured on the 45nm process for some time after that.

If the 32nm parts work on the first generation lga 1156 socket boards, then its likely that when the i5 quads switch to 32nm they will work too.

i7 doesnt really have "less" features, it has the QPI bus, which means high bandwidth devices like Sata3, and USB3 can be built into motherboards without any worries about saturating the cpu's busses.

i5 doesnt have QPI, it has a much slower DMI coupled with a PCIe v2 16 lane controller built into the cpu. (Pretty sure its 16 lane). So the i7 has better potential if you need more than 16 lanes, as it uses a PCIe controller chip connected to the QPI. Of course i5 motherboards can still put a bridge chip in, giving more than 16 lanes, where some of the bandwidth is used in a gpu -> gpu communication, but the combined total bandwidth to the CPU and the memory (as the memory controllers on chip) will be limited to 16 lanes.

The EOL of the 920 was announced ages ago, no doubt intel will have some new parts to put in the i7 lineup, higher clocked quads, and 6 core parts. PS.. SEXCore? I believe the correct term would be Hexcore. (not to be confused with hexadecimal, which is base 16, simply hex(6) + decimal(10).)

(Tri - Quad - Pent - Hex - Hept - Octo - Nona - Deca ) Polygons, and CPU core counts have names derived from greek not latin.
 
Last edited:
The i5 might actually be a pretty good choice for gamers who dont need more than PCIe v2.0 16 lane, as it's turbo mode increases the clock speed by 6 bins instead of 2 compared to i7. So for older software, or games that dont make much use of multi cores, it should have a pretty high clock speed in turbo mode.
 
what id like to know, does x58 support 6 core cpus. or will you have to get a new motherbaord, even if the 6 core cpu is still socket 1366.

Can't remember where I read it, but it is confirmed that most current X58 motherboards will support hexcore CPU's. Not sure whether they'll need BIOS updates or not, but it will be possible. Although you will have to replace your board for SATA3 and USB3.
 
Can't remember where I read it, but it is confirmed that most current X58 motherboards will support hexcore CPU's. Not sure whether they'll need BIOS updates or not, but it will be possible. Although you will have to replace your board for SATA3 and USB3.

Don't forget to replace your board again when pcie-3 comes in as well ;)
 
Really got a link? the week 15 roadmap has it going until Q2 2010 with the 2.8Ghz i5 CPU sitting just below it.

To be honest, I cant even find the source again, was probably either BS, or a U turn. However back when I read, it I recall thinking it made sence to axe the 2.66 and move the 940 onto that price point, especially with the i5's coming out.

If I find the original info I'll post anyway.

It could be that someone had heard that intel were planning to axe one of the i7's and simply guessed it was the 920. Another possibility is the 920 will end up being the i7 version of the 6600, a chip that sticks around like a faithfull old dog, long after its been updated by better models.
 
Last edited:
However back when I read, it I recall thinking it made sence to axe the 2.66 and move the 940 onto that price point, especially with the i5's coming out.

Haha I think it might actually have been me that said that for the reasons you already stated but afterwards corrected myself, below is a slide from the april roadmap notice the 920 being in between two lynnfield chips.

Desktop.jpg
 
Lynnfield Preview

Beat me by three mins,

Why would anyone want a LGA-1366 system then? I believe there are three major advantages to the LGA-1366 platform for single-socket desktops:

1) Support for Gulftown. You can only get 6-cores from the LGA-1366 platform in 1H 2010, Intel currently doesn't have any 6-core LGA-1156 parts planned.

2) More overclockable CPUs. The best yielding Nehalems (and highest clocked Nehalems) will be LGA-1366 processors. I wouldn't expect any 1GHz+ overclocks from LGA-1156 CPUs.

3) More bandwidth to PCIe slots. I don't see this as a huge advantage today, but there may come a time when having as much bandwidth to your GPUs as possible is important. I'm thinking general purpose GPU computing, DX11, OpenCL sort of stuff. But we're not there yet.

Ultimately I'm going to stick with what I first said on the whole LGA-1156 vs. LGA-1366 topic last November:

"The breakdown seems pretty simple: if you’re the type of person who bought the Q6600/Q9300, then Lynnfield may be the Nehalem for you. If you spent a bit more on your CPU or are more of an enthusiast overclocker, the current Core i7 seems like the path Intel wants you to take."
 
Back
Top Bottom