Hello again Stephan,
I'd be interested to know your thoughts a bit more . . . you originally were gonna go for the
Athlon™ II X4 but then "someone" informed you that perhaps grabbing a Phenom™ II X2 and unlocking it was a better choice . . . above we covered the basic in and outs of whats involved in unlocking and the fact it wasn't guaranteed, we then looked at some performance results showing how the Athlon™ II X4 compared vs a successful unlock on a Phenom™ II X2 (to X4) or a premium splurge on a guaranteed Phenom™ II X4
For the sake of thoroughness I thought it may be prudent to also include a straight up comparison between the
Athlon™ II X4 635 vs a
Phenom™ II X2 555 . . . this assumes that you tried the Deneb "Gamble" but got unlucky and the extra cores wouldn't unlock or at least run stably . . .
Phenom™ II X2 has a 10.3% stock clock speed advantage, a 6MB slab of L3-cache yet on the overall average is outperformed by the Athlon™ II X4 635 by a tasty +34.4% . . . zoning in on just the gaming tests show the X2 555's added clock speed and cache are worth on average an extra 3.8% performance vs the Propus X4 . . . 3.8%?

. . . this would have been a +9.3% framerate advantage but we see something unexpected happen in the Dragon Age Origins results where the Athlon™ II X4 635 with its extra cores suddenly comes to life and now commands a very respectable +41.3% performance advantage!
This leads me to believe that the advantages of a sucessful unlock (+16.6% Deneb X4) are kinda outweighed to some extent by the potential downside of a failed unlock . . . i.e the Propus X4 costs £3.00 less and is guaranteed to perform on average 34.4% faster than a Deneb X2 . . . of course this is task specific but working with the above data it would seem that the Phenom™ II X2 at £83.99 is OverPriced and probably needs a decent price slash to once again make it a compelling choice for the bang-for-buck brigade!
Happy to discuss, share thoughts etc
