Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Roughneck said:wow cool website
im so glad i just got my 4600 instead of spending 500 quid on a conroe setup.
just not worth it for the difference wich imho your only going to see in benchmarks
Roughneck said:wow cool website
im so glad i just got my 4600 instead of spending 500 quid on a conroe setup.
just not worth it for the difference wich imho your only going to see in benchmarks
Papa Lazarou said:At stock speeds the E6300 could probably be roughly compared to the AMD X2 4200. In Sandra benchmarks floating point is about the same, integer somewhat faster in the Intels favour. It will be substantially faster than a stock 805.
Overclocked it depends on your platform etc and luck to some extent, as to how far you can go. An E6300 at say, 3.2 ghz will destroy an 805 at 4 ghz though, by a wide margin.
UKTopGun said:Mobo - £100, Ram - £150, E6300 - £125.
I work that out as £375. Plus the resell value of whatever you had which might have been £100 possibly more. That works out as only £100 (375 - 100 = 275) more than the price of your X2 4600+ except the £100 extra owns it because it overclockers to the X6800 speeds which you can see is excellent in all tests (Only saying about overclock cos I think 4600 can only go FX-62 speeds).
Stelly said:Really??
Stelly
Roughneck said:no no I got the 4600 here when they were flogging em for about 150 +vat