Could someone take a look at this please and help me

Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
1,088
Location
London
Could someone take a look at this please and tell me where im going wrong I cant even boot at anything over 2200ghz

I have tried upping the voltage to 1.375

Clipboard01.jpg



Clipboard02.jpg


Thanks
 
Drop the ht multy to 3x to keep inder 1000.

What is the rating of your ram as you are running that at 220Mhz which may cause a problem if its pc3200 stuff. Drop the divider so it runs slower.

Also dont be scared to up the voltage a bit more :)

What are your load temps like? Try to keep under 50c and dont go above 1.55v

What motherboard and cooler do you have?
 
The ram is pc 3200

The motherboard is a asus a8n e

Temps are about 43 under load

Cooler is a gigabyte heat pie thing cant remember which
 
Droping the multi to x3 allowed me to get into windows for a couple of seconds then had a restart
 
Last edited:
Did you drop the ram speed so that its running at 200 instead of 220?

Yes tried at 166 x3 and at 200 x4

I have to be missing something?

It will run 10x220 fine 1:1 then it should run a higher FSB with a 4 or 3x multiplier
 
Last edited:
The x3 or the x4 multy is the htt freq (3xfsb of cpu) not the ram speed. There should be a setting in bios for running a divided on the ram so that is running at 200mhz even tho the cpu is at 220+

You have ram set to cpu/10 so one u go to say 2300MHz the ram is running at 230mhz when its only rated for 200Mhz

Did you try carnking up the voltage as temps are fine :)

Might need a bit extra on the chipset and ltt voltage too (not sure if ** mb has those adjustments)
 
The x3 or the x4 multy is the htt freq (3xfsb of cpu) not the ram speed. There should be a setting in bios for running a divided on the ram so that is running at 200mhz even tho the cpu is at 220+

You have ram set to cpu/10 so one u go to say 2300MHz the ram is running at 230mhz when its only rated for 200Mhz

Did you try carnking up the voltage as temps are fine :)

Might need a bit extra on the chipset and ltt voltage too (not sure if ** mb has those adjustments)


Ah i got ya now Ive have dropped the memlock divider down to 333 i'll try again, I thought the HTT multiplier sorted the memory speed out

Cheers
 
Ok Ive tried the the memory divider at 166 and 133. What should should i set the HTT to ?

It will now POST at 2400 but crashes on the windows start up screen thats with 1.385v and 2.5v on the ram
 
HTT should be set to 4x if you are runninjg the cpu at 240FSB. My bad in previous post where i said 3x :( try to keep as close to 1000 as possible)

The ram will need more than 2.5 volts. Most is at least 2.6v so change that in bios.

Give it some more volts too :)

Not all will do good speeds so you might just have a bad clocker that needs more voltage. Do you know the stepping code thats stamped on the cpu IHS?

Do you have any other voltage adjustments in the bios you could increase?

Got an opteron myself that needs 1.42v to do 2800 but 1.52v to do 2950.

All cpus are different.

Just keep it under 1.55v and 50c (ish) to be safe
 
Ok now boots to windows but not stable settings are

10x230
1.4volts cpu
2.7 on the ram
HTT x3
memclock divider @ 333 also tried 266

Temps are 46 under load though its not easy to test under load because it keeps falling over so from crash to getting into the bios the temp have about 10seconds to cool

Either ive got a rubbish CPU or something else is holding me back, could it be that the ram is running dual channel

It is frustrating to hear of other people running these at 2.6 at stock volts
 
Nah ram should be fine in dual channel.

Whats the spd timings of your ram in cpu-z?

Whats your chipset temp? Did you up the voltage for that?

Up the htt to 4x to give 960Mhz htt

Up the volts on cpu :)

Not familiar with your motherboard but not all are capable of high fsb. Quiet a lot top out at 250ish.....dfi ultras are good for 300+ though :)
 
I had a 3400 running higher than that on the same board. Found that dropping the multiplier and increasing the front side bus was what's needed.

It was very fussy about ram timings also. The last number in the timings (tRAS) should be a total of the others or rounded up to a hole number if a .5 . Example, if you have 3/3/3/8, should be 3+3+3=9 or if 2.5/3/3/9.
Just my findings with this board but got the ram up to 500mhz if I remember right PC3200 budget brand of some type at 3/3/2/8, or was it 3/2/3/8:confused:. Was looking for an excuse to burn it out and get some good stuff so wasn't too worried about pumping as much voltage in it as I could.
 
I had a 3400 running higher than that on the same board. Found that dropping the multiplier and increasing the front side bus was what's needed.

It was very fussy about ram timings also. The last number in the timings (tRAS) should be a total of the others or rounded up to a hole number if a .5 . Example, if you have 3/3/3/8, should be 3+3+3=9 or if 2.5/3/3/9.
Just my findings with this board but got the ram up to 500mhz if I remember right PC3200 budget brand of some type at 3/3/2/8, or was it 3/2/3/8:confused:. Was looking for an excuse to burn it out and get some good stuff so wasn't too worried about pumping as much voltage in it as I could.

That has help loads thanks, now stable @ 2375 9.5 x 250 Core @1.4 52c under load A little high but the ram timings was probally the issue i'll try and lower the volts to the core and see what happens

Thanks to both of you
 
You've probably got a better clock more to do with the lower multiplier than the memory timings. I would try and avoid half multipliers because the don't technically exist. Strange things start to happen with your CPU to RAM ratio.

I know it seems strange and that its a backwards step in over all clock speed but try going down to X9 on the CPU; Going down on the ram speed to 333 and upping the Front side but until you compensate for the lower multiplier.

I wouldn't worry about the temp too much just keep it under 60 for long term use.
 
Back
Top Bottom