Coverage: 2.4GHz vs. Dual band vs. AC

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
15,713
Location
North Wales
Hi,

I have a fairly old/cheap Buffalo WAP at the moment, that I'm thinking of upgrading with something offering better coverage. What is the coverage like on "dual band" or AC routers compared to 2.4ghz? Worth the upgrade?
 
The 5 GHz frequency band can carry a lot more information (hence giving you faster speed), but is not as good at penetrating walls. So you get faster connectivity when you are close to the wifi access point, but a much weaker signal when you are further away. Hence dual-band gives you the best of both worlds. 5 Ghz for speed when close, and 2.4 GHz for longer range through walls.
 
What devices will be connecting?

Laptops, tablets and phones (upto 6 in total).

The 5 GHz frequency band can carry a lot more information (hence giving you faster speed), but is not as good at penetrating walls. So you get faster connectivity when you are close to the wifi access point, but a much weaker signal when you are further away. Hence dual-band gives you the best of both worlds. 5 Ghz for speed when close, and 2.4 GHz for longer range through walls.


To be honest, data transfer isn't the priority more decent signal. It's a fairly small property though all on one level. What's the major difference between "dual band" and 802.11ac?

I seem to be able to pick up an access point with gigabit ports and dual band for around £40, but ac ones are pretty much double...
 
In my experience, that sort of thing can be hit and miss. There are lots of variables, in this case the transmitter power may be the biggest problem. If you have time to read reviews (and money), try and get something that has a few positive reviews. Obviously there are a few "known-good" winners at the top end of the market (Asus being the most famous), but at the lower end you may not necessarily get something that much better than what you have.

Dual band means 2.4 GHz (the old frequency range, covering 802.11b, g, n) and 5 GHz (the new frequency range for n and now ac). 802.11ac is the way in which the signal is encoded, how many stream can send and receive simultaneously, the way multiple frequency channels are used and aggregated, techniques for adjusting to interference, etc. It is "just" a cleverer way of sending and receiving data using the same set of frequencies that 802.11n uses.

The general rule is that as frequency and data rate goes up, it becomes less able to handle interference. In your case, I suspect this means you need a good quality 2.4GHz Wifi access point more than a dual band one. However, most good Wifi access points will be dual band.
 
Thanks rotor, I'll take a look around. I'm not sure how much I want to spend yet, the idea was to replace my old gigabit switch and separate WAP with something better just to keep it neater, but there's nothing particularly wrong with it so I may just put it off till one of them gives up...
 
Back
Top Bottom