• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

CPU for Photoshop

Soldato
Joined
26 Aug 2004
Posts
3,806
Location
Manchester
I'm going to be building my sister a PC in the coming weeks. I wouldn't say she's a heavy PS user, but she still uses it a fair bit for college and other things.

I'll be going for a C2D (and overclocking, hence my thread in the motherboard section), but would I be able to get away with an E2XX or would the 1mb cache kill it?

Would I be a lot better off with the 2mb cache of an E4500?
 
While CPU grunt is important for Photoshop, RAM will be more useful. It's still a 32bit app so there's no need to go nuts but if you can stretch to 4Gb then do so.
 
I'll be sticking 2GB in at first - if it really needs it I can add another 2GB at a later date.

So summing up my first post, what I basically want to know is; is it worth the extra ~£30 for an extra 1mb of cache (GHz is irrelevant as they should both hit 3 no problem).
 
Why are you bothering to overclock a brand new proc for PS use? Pointless imho. You want 2Gb for PS for doing any decent level of editing. Cache won't really make any odds with PS operation.
 
My e2180 @ 3.2 makes photoshop fly :)

The extra cache performs ~5/10% faster at the same clock speed - you really won't notice the difference in Photoshop at all.

Biggest thing for me was going from XP to vista64 - Photoshop, with a ton o' fonts and plugins, opens faster than I can say "omg ninja 'shop time". :)
 
The Custom PC Media Benchmarks I ran comparing an E2140 at 3Ghz and an E4400 at 3Ghz showed no appreciable difference in the image editing test, which uses GIMP.

I expect Photoshop (although depends on which versions) to be no different even though it is partially multithreaded, as you are comparing two dual cores. I would expect some difference between a dual and a quad though, especially when applying filters (the multithreaded part).
 
Why not overclock a processor for Photoshop use? Try filtering an entire image of sizeable dimensions (i.e. 1200x1200 or something) and you'll see what I mean. Seconds can mean everything when you just want to get on with something.
 
Back
Top Bottom