• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

CPU Speed vs Screen Resolution

Associate
Joined
5 Nov 2004
Posts
1,593
Location
Central UK
With a higher screen resolution (gaming) does the load increase on the CPU? I have an 8800GTS 512 and E5200 @ 3GHz - fps in Farcry2 at very high settings & 4 x AA is around the 23 mark, this increases as I drop the resolution down but have a 24" screen and find the native 1920 x 1200 is far crisper so wish to always use this resolution. I often read about CPU bottlenecks with higher powered GPU's and was wondering if my CPU was the limiting factor on the 23 fps and getting a GTX280/GTX285 would be a pointless exercise with my CPU - so would an E5200 bottleneck a GTX280/285? Or only at lower resolutions?
 
CPU is only really a factor when maxing out GPUs (for silly benchmarks) at lower resolutions... in most cases the CPU load on the game is the same and the GPU is taking up most of the work for rendering higher resolutions so CPU hit is minimal.
 
Not drastically. AA can use more CPU however albeit still primarily dependent on GPU.
Chances are the reason you get more FPS at lower resolution is because it is reducing the load on your 8800GTS. At 1920x1200 4xAA you are almost certainly GPU limited.
 
Well I've just dropped the CPU back to stock speeds (2.5GHz) and the frame rate seems about the same so I guess there's some ceiling yet on the CPU, I'll invest in a faster card I think. Thanks :)
 
A CPU has to do the same amount of work at 640*480 as 2560*1600

It is the GPU that has to do more when the resolution increases
 
Back
Top Bottom