With my recent overheating problems on an Acer 5930G, it got me wondering about the legality of using the throttling mechanism as part of the overall cooling strategy.
E.g. you play a game for 5 minutes, lappy heats up too much, CPU/GPU throttles to 40% of its normal speed and temperatures drop over the next 1-2 minutes. Then CPU/GPU speed up again until the lappy overheats again. Repeat until you get annoyed and quit.
What if Acer Support try to fob me off with an excuse like: "it's supposed to throttle down to prevent damage to the CPU/GPU".
It means that this CPU spends 20-40% of the time at the lower speed, and my question is whether this is a prima facie case for obtaining a refund (albeit after 4 months) because the laptop was advertised at 2GHz but has inadequate cooling for 2GHz?
E.g. you play a game for 5 minutes, lappy heats up too much, CPU/GPU throttles to 40% of its normal speed and temperatures drop over the next 1-2 minutes. Then CPU/GPU speed up again until the lappy overheats again. Repeat until you get annoyed and quit.
What if Acer Support try to fob me off with an excuse like: "it's supposed to throttle down to prevent damage to the CPU/GPU".
It means that this CPU spends 20-40% of the time at the lower speed, and my question is whether this is a prima facie case for obtaining a refund (albeit after 4 months) because the laptop was advertised at 2GHz but has inadequate cooling for 2GHz?