Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCI-E Soundcard Mini Review

Soldato
Joined
22 Aug 2010
Posts
4,870
Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCI-E Soundcard Mini Review (headset only)

Last night I was trying out the Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCI-E Soundcard. The card was compared to my XFI Titanium Fatal1ty edition SC and both cards were used with Steelseries Sibera V2.


Intro

My choice for having the XFI Titanium is that i'm quite into competitive fps gaming and felt that out the cards I have trialed before, the Titanium always gave the clearest sound when it came to in game, as anyone who plays games competitively knows how important having decent sound is. Although the XFI Titanium is excellent in gaming, the sound quality for movies and music compared to such a card as a ASUS Xonar D2X was easily noticeably less, however with I reserved high hopes for the Recon3D.

Software

After installing the card and the drivers, I started to take a look at the features within the software. The software still had all the THX and Dolby Digital tweaks which previous Titanium software used and the software was very simple to navigate with very clear features.

[SCREEN WILL BE PLACED HERE]

The one feature which really excited me was the "Scout Mode" which was a setting dedicated to increasing in-game sounds for more accurate 3D positioning which is vital in many different games to have the advantage over the enemy. This was a feature I was very eager to try out. The style and description "Scout Mode" reminded me of what I normally use called SVM (Smart Volume Control) which in games makes quieter sounds louder (footsteps) and louder sounds quieter (gunfire) so I was interested how it would compare to this as on the software it also had it's own Smart Volume section in another tab.


Music Testing

I started off using the sound card to listen to some music, dubstep with a nice deep bass to test a good range of frequencies to make sure that it could handle all ranges whilst maintaining perfect quality. My first impression after turning the music on was that I could instantly notice the better quality compared to the XFI Titanium. The sound had a much deeper and rich feel but I could certainly notice that Creative wanted to make sure on this edition of the card they gave more of an impressive media experience along with gaming. The onboard AMP was highly impressive as I could increase the volume of the music with no quality loss and tweaking the bass settings in the dolby digital studio really gave a much more thrilling experience. To me this is a great upgrade for music on a Stereo headset, I am looking forward to testing it out with a 5.1 pair of Roccat Kaves.

Gaming

I finished listening and enjoying some music and moved onto gaming, I booted up Call of Duty 4 (still the best one) and went into a TDM server to begin with. I wanted to start playing without the Scout Mode to make sure I would easily make a difference between normal mode and with it enabled. I turned off all Dolby settings to make sure I would be listening to the sound card in it's native hardware format with no added features. In the game the sound was very clear and this was mixed with the high quality feature as experienced when listening to music. This was noticeable when firing the gun, I could notice that it had a much deeper and almost nicer sounding tone rather than a very short and snappy clear sound of the XFI titanium. I played for about an hour and I can compare it directly to the XFI Titanium as a gaming sound card which the have kept all the qualities of this.


Scout Mode

I then started to play SND (Seach and Destroy, one life per round) which with a decent sound card can mean either being shot down because you couldn't hear an enemy of hearing them from further away to have the advantage over them. I now enabled Scout Mode to see how this would perform. On enabling all sounds had increased, so my first impression of difference from SVM is that it keeps even the louder noises still pretty loud. I would listen to see how far away I could hear the enemy running and shooting and I was very impressed. In some cases I could hear them from half the map to their exact location. A gunfire would come out very clearly in the correct location meaning you couldn't miss it, or it being too quiet. Scout Mode was especially good for footsteps. SVM is fantastic for footsteps and small sounds as it really does increase the volume but Scout Mode made these quieter sounds even louder, it could be the amp working it's magic but for gaming and situations when you need to hear every step it really shines.


Final Thoughts

I am thoroughly impressed with Creative's latest launch, and anyone who has an XFI Titanium looking for the next step in audio upgrading but wanting to keep the qualities of a gaming sound card, I would highly recommend this Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCI-E Soundcard. For me it's the perfect mix of sound quality and maintaining what I'm looking for in a soundcard for gaming. I'm going to be testing the same card with a 5.1 Headset so this will hopefully be an even better experience as I normally game with a 5.1 headset.


Couple of snaps I took of the card pre-installation.

creative_Recon3D_full.JPG


creative_Recon3D.JPG
 
Interesting, seems to go against what I've heard which is that this card is not as good as the Titanium and below the specs for the Xonar cards. I’m still waiting for some proper reviews from tech sites.

AStaley.
 
Interesting, seems to go against what I've heard which is that this card is not as good as the Titanium and below the specs for the Xonar cards. I’m still waiting for some proper reviews from tech sites.

AStaley.

Ive read that its far less advanced than any of the x-fi chips, its just some old chip with clever marketing (quad core? bs!) tacked on and in some cases an EMI shield so it looks and sounds (pun not intended) like a good buy.
 
Creative are very good at re-releasing the same card in different disguises, so it wouldn't surprise me if these Recon3D cards are no different.
 
Ive read that its far less advanced than any of the x-fi chips, its just some old chip with clever marketing (quad core? bs!) tacked on and in some cases an EMI shield so it looks and sounds (pun not intended) like a good buy.

So its actually no better than the titanium fatality, just a re-branding ?
 
Just went to my comp shop and asked about this card, the guy in there is quite the audiophile so i thought it would be good to ask him before i shell out £100+ for something that has had zero reviews anywhere

In his words "look at the pcb, its nearly naked and lacking components, stick with the titanium"

He also went onto tell me that anyone who reviews this thing and praises it as the best thing since sliced bread is either on the pay roll of creative or needs a hearing aid badly.
 
That's what has surprised a few people, the lack of components on the board.

It's a joke when you consider how much they sell for, especially the Fatal1ty. £110+?

You can't remove components and increase the sound quality.

I mean no offense to Valkia, but you have got to take that review with a pinch of salt. After all he does work a for a company that is selling the card. Not really going to do sales any good, if he said it was rubbish. ;)
 
That's what has surprised a few people, the lack of components on the board.

It's a joke when you consider how much they sell for, especially the Fatal1ty. £110+?

You can't remove components and increase the sound quality.

I mean no offense to Valkia, but you have got to take that review with a pinch of salt. After all he does work a for a company that is selling the card. Not really going to do sales any good, if he said it was rubbish. ;)

i don-t understand creatives reasoning behind this, bring out a "new card" with less performance and expect it to sell, the only sites/places i have seen good reviews of this card are places that sell the card AKA overclockers and other e-tailors, review sites say its a downgrade from a titanium fatal1ty pro not an upgrade.
 
How many components do you really need on an audio card? Afterall, thanks to windows vista/7 and 8? The soundcard does nothing but stream Windows Software mixed audio. No fancy hardware for cool effects as devs just dont support OpenAL/eax/dxsound anymore.

I guess this card could be a simple (or not so simple) dac under the cooler and the audio quality is based on its output.
 
i don-t understand creatives reasoning behind this, bring out a "new card" with less performance and expect it to sell, the only sites/places i have seen good reviews of this card are places that sell the card AKA overclockers and other e-tailors, review sites say its a downgrade from a titanium fatal1ty pro not an upgrade.

+1

Heard them both on the same speakers/computer and the Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium - Fatal1ty Professionalty pro sounds a lot better and also it has bass and treble controls which the "NEW" card has none and only can be adjusted via the EQ. Also the Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D Fatal1ty Professional Soundcard does not have DTS encoding. It's a huge downgrade of a card compared to the Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium - Fatal1ty Professionalty pro. Only card better from Creative compared to the Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium - Fatal1ty Professionalty pro is the Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium HD. Sorry OCUK but start stocking the Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium HD again for people who want to go Creative for audio and get a good price on them for the people that want good quality sound and features from their audio on their computers.

Creative is doing the classic again of ripping off it's customers with a so called "NEW" card that is worse than the last generation soundwise and featurewise.

Check reviews of the Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D Fatal1ty Professional Soundcard on other sites by customers and what they have noticed compared to last gens cards. The truth is out there as they say ;).


As you can see they even lied on their spec sheet that the new card has DTS connect (Highlighted in red) which it does not. Check for yourself on their http://uk.store.creative.com/sound-blaster/sound-blaster-recon3d-fatal1ty-professional/1-20886.aspx link they even don't mention DTS encoding only Dolby.

ip5t2t.jpg



Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D Fatal1ty Professional (As you can see no DTS connect (the DTS encoding) on the software).


6p18q1.jpg





Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium - Fatal1ty Professionalty pro (As you can see DTS encoding and Dolby)


14xpae.jpg



valkia- thanks for the mini review.
 
Last edited:
So its actually no better than the titanium fatality, just a re-branding ?

Pretty much, its worse than any x-fi card (except the fake x-fi's like extreme audio) by a long shot.

The point about the PCB being bare is a good one too, check the mid range xonar DX:

http://peterhallam.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/DSC09354-Asus-Xonar-DX-soundcard.jpg

And the x-fi titanium:

http://www.ixbt.com/multimedia/creative/titanium/card1.jpg

And the x-fi titanium HD

http://www.computeralliance.com.au/...pisf55))/productimages_extra\12588_9502_l.jpg

Then compare to this "new" creative card:

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/screenshots/medium/2011/09/Creative_Sound_Core_Recon_3D-14.jpg

Its all a marketing thing, cheap plastic outputs, lower quality capacitors (the standard titanium is guilty of these as well BTW) less advanced audio chip but a shiny new name.
 
I find it odd that people are basing opinions on how a circuit board looks :/ Personally I don't really care how a souncard looks since I never see it inside my PC. Has anyone analysed the components and explained why it's a bad thing that certain parts are missing?

If it happens to be cheap/crap or whatever then it would be nice to see actual reasons for this other than people being suspicious of Creative. So far all I've seen is that it has a few less features than other cards.


I find it weird that nobody has found a way to test sound equipment in a uniform manner that gives scores and figures that mean something. A kind of benchmark for audio equipment would be useful to compare products but I guess it's difficult to do this otherwise people would be doing it :/
 
BTW - I'm not saying it isn't crap :P I would just like to see more knowledgeable slagging off of Creative products lol
 
I find it odd that people are basing opinions on how a circuit board looks :/ Personally I don't really care how a souncard looks since I never see it inside my PC. Has anyone analysed the components and explained why it's a bad thing that certain parts are missing?

If it happens to be cheap/crap or whatever then it would be nice to see actual reasons for this other than people being suspicious of Creative. So far all I've seen is that it has a few less features than other cards.


I find it weird that nobody has found a way to test sound equipment in a uniform manner that gives scores and figures that mean something. A kind of benchmark for audio equipment would be useful to compare products but I guess it's difficult to do this otherwise people would be doing it :/

Well you can tell a lot by looking at the PCB alone. As I mentioned earlier it has cheap plastic outputs, lower quality capacitors and a less advanced audio chip plus no replaceable op amps which is standard for £100+ sound cards. If none of that bothers you then why not save some cash and get this:

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=SC-078-CL&groupid=701&catid=11&subcat=

or

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=SC-012-AS&groupid=701&catid=11&subcat=

They will sound the same as any core3d card.
 
I already have a Titanium HD so I'm not really looking to change :)

If the components really are lower grade than previously used then that does indeed suck! As for replaceable Op-Amps - thats' only something I've seen on the most expensive soundcards from Asus/Creative. I can't say I've seen these advertised for any of the lesser ones?
 
Back
Top Bottom