-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
crysis vs ut3
- Thread starter Phil2008
- Start date
crysis beta runs a lot slower for me than ut3 demo does. but crysis looks far better than ut3.
i run crysis beta at high textures, low shadows, and all other settings on medium, framerate is all over the place, in some places it gets 60fps, it others it goes down to 15fps. overall average fps id say is 25fps. so its not very good, no AA and a rez of 1152x864.
i run crysis beta at high textures, low shadows, and all other settings on medium, framerate is all over the place, in some places it gets 60fps, it others it goes down to 15fps. overall average fps id say is 25fps. so its not very good, no AA and a rez of 1152x864.
I havntt tried any betas but apparntly crysis beta 1 dont use multi cpus. so with a bit of luck beta 3 and the single player demo thats out friday will use multi cpus, causing a huge performance boost.
Cos when I had my fx55 @ 2.78 (single core) DiRT ran really chuggy in the 6-8car races. Then when I got my opty 185 @ 2.78 DiRT (dual core) ran so much smoother in the 6-8car races.
Cos when I had my fx55 @ 2.78 (single core) DiRT ran really chuggy in the 6-8car races. Then when I got my opty 185 @ 2.78 DiRT (dual core) ran so much smoother in the 6-8car races.
What beta is that, and how meny cores does crysis use?
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 20,354
- Location
- Stanley Hotel, Colorado
Ignore the crysis problem with beta, the demo is out in 24hr I think and should run much better.
I guessing thats why the NDA was so prominent, they allready know its not running properly.
I guessing thats why the NDA was so prominent, they allready know its not running properly.
I hope it's not flippin' set back again
. That was murder last month but the demo release of CoD4 and UT3 done Crysis a huge favour for to settle the nerves of the people eagerly waiting. Roll on the demo release. I just hope it's out over the next 2 days as I'm testing my m8's GTX's. The only chance I'll get to play with some AA lol.
cant wait for the demo purely to get an idea of graphical details my pc will be able to process. on the beta it makes minimal difference to my fps changing from all low to all high. on low detail it still runs on average 20 - 25 fps. on high it is the same?!
UT3 runs flawless on high settings, around 55-60 fps. however it is no Crysis which looks stunning on high settings. not seen any other game come close to rendering such amazing gfx
UT3 runs flawless on high settings, around 55-60 fps. however it is no Crysis which looks stunning on high settings. not seen any other game come close to rendering such amazing gfx
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,080
- Location
- In a house
I can't see em delaying the demo again this time, as they have a whole page with a big countdown clock counting down the time left to the demo's release, be a bit of a shambles if the time runs out and demo's delayed again. 
I can't see em delaying the demo again this time, as they have a whole page with a big countdown clock counting down the time left to the demo's release, be a bit of a shambles if the time runs out and demo's delayed again.
They just change the time or slow down the countdown
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 5,152
- Location
- Blackburn
you only running UT3 at medium graphics settings as thats what the demo is limited to btw
...assuming it's bottlenecked by the CPU. Might help with graphics as I think the drivers are optimised for multicore now.